Search for: "Mays v. State" Results 2981 - 3000 of 118,997
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Sep 2008, 5:19 pm
Your prostition business may well be exclusively in-state. [read post]
13 May 2008, 10:30 am
May 13, 2008) (Judge Ryan for a unanimous court), and United States v. [read post]
14 May 2008, 11:39 am
May 14, 2008).United States v. [read post]
3 May 2010, 10:36 am
The federal Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act basically says that the state can't burden religious practices for people in an "institution" -- e.g., a prison. [read post]
17 Aug 2017, 2:18 am by Joe Rosenbaum
Further complicating matters, a new EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) comes into effect on May 25, 2018. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 2:53 am by Michael DelSignore
If the Court chooses to hear this appeal, the Justices may finally provide much needed direction and clarification following the Court's problematic 2012 opinion in Williams v. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 3:35 am
In Abiele Contracting, Inc. v New York City School Construction Authority, 91 NY2d 1, the court held that the doctrine may apply to bar relitigating issues decided by administrative agencies if those decisions are "quasi-judicial" in nature. [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 1:20 pm
 If they don't shape up, they may find themselves invaded. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 12:50 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
EPA, the standing requirements to challenge a federal agency action may be easier to meet than standing requirements generally.This issue arose in the oral argument when AEP’s attorney, Sidley Austin’s Peter Keisler, was asked whether Mass v. [read post]
27 Jul 2016, 3:04 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The Secretary of State sought to deport the defendant under the Immigration (European Economic Area) Regulations 2006, regs 19(3)(b) and 21. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 4:53 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The first is how law firms may charge clients in a charging lien or a fee claim for fixed monthly electronic research costs, the second is an application of account stated, and the third is an analysis of a Judiciary Law 487 counterclaim. [read post]