Search for: "People v. To"
Results 2981 - 3000
of 72,985
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Aug 2015, 11:20 am
Case citation: US v. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 9:00 am
When people blindly follow a letter, whether it be D or R, and feel compelled to support every leg of that party's platform, it leaves very little room for reasoned discussion on issues. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 8:24 pm
Finally, she told me that while Trump v. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 1:16 pm
It's been about two years, so I guess it was about time to write about Oracle v. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 11:21 pm
(See also People v. [read post]
7 May 2018, 11:49 am
Others would perceive the opposite.Ultimately the plaintiffs don't get any relief.But they definitely had neutral people hear and think about their case.A lot. [read post]
13 Feb 2007, 1:27 am
Nonetheless, when I read opinions like this one, I have a hard time figuring out which one I abhor more: the disgraceful rich people (like Swartz) who purchase these abusive tax shelters or the disgraceful rich people (like KMPG) who create and sell them.Tough call. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 9:55 am
Case citation: Court of Master Sommeliers v. [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 11:56 am
In a 2013 decision, State v. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 7:56 am
This is why people must be extremely wary in signing these waivers. [read post]
28 Sep 2007, 8:31 am
*******Citizen Coverage**********(NOTE:This space is reserved for citizen coverage of the Virgin v. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 12:00 am
PEOPLE v. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 7:47 pm
A reminder: In 1986 the Court of Appeals held that a party seeking a missing witness instruction has the burden of making the request "as soon as practicable" (People v Gonzalez, 68 NY2d 424, 428 [1986]). [read post]
3 May 2014, 8:00 pm
Here is a brief summary of the report<http://www.citizen.org/concepcion-third-anniversary-corporate-wrongdoing-forced-arbitration-report>:“Cases That Would Have Been: Three Years After AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 8:46 am
Under those circumstances, we conclude that defendant did not knowingly waive his right to appeal with respect to Supreme Court's denial of the request by defendant for youthful offender status at sentencing (see generally People v McCarthy, 83 AD3d 1533, lv denied 17 NY3d 819; People v Fehr, 303 AD2d 1039, lv denied 100 NY2d 538; People v Hendricks, 270 AD2d 944). [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 3:25 pm
Like the suspected robber in Smith v. [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 7:50 am
The post State v. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 9:12 pm
CAR DEALERSHIP SELLS CAR TO TWO BLIND PEOPLE. [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 1:57 pm
People v. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 1:00 am
The litigation seeks to empower people dying of terminal illnesses to be autonomous decision makers with control over their bodies, lives, and medical care. [read post]
