Search for: "S. Sherman" Results 2981 - 3000 of 5,994
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Aug 2017, 6:27 am by Joy Waltemath
The Chamber filed this action arguing that the ordinance violates and is preempted by the Sherman Antitrust Act, is preempted by the NLRA, violates 42 U.S.C. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 11:51 am by Ashby Jones
No Sherman Act, no Voting Rights Act, no Title VII. [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 1:38 pm by Resnick Law Group, P.C.
The Sherman Act authorizes the United States Attorney’s Office, which is part of the DOJ, to pursue claims for antitrust violations. [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 1:38 pm by Resnick Law Group, P.C.
The Sherman Act authorizes the United States Attorney’s Office, which is part of the DOJ, to pursue claims for antitrust violations. [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 8:00 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
 Count one alleged that the hospitals agreed to suppress nurse wages in violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Act. [read post]
28 May 2010, 7:23 am
Bd. of Regents (1984-2 Trade Cases ¶66,139), agreements among sports teams about whether and how they will participate in the marketplace are subject to scrutiny under the Sherman Act, Section 1. [read post]
2 May 2017, 11:57 am by Resnick Law Group, P.C.
The main federal antitrust statute is the Sherman Act, originally enacted by Congress in 1890 in an effort to address monopolistic practices across the country. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 7:20 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Hansen’s products are thus allegedly “adulterated” in violation of California’s Sherman Law because they “present an unreasonable risk of illness or injury when used as directed or marketed. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 10:55 am by Woodrow Pollack
Sherman Act Violation & Noerr-Pennington Immunity Next, ABF accused PODS of attempted monopolization in violation of the Sherman Act by registering trademarks for the "generic term" "pods" and asserting those trademarks against competitors. [read post]
The Department of Justice recently filed a complaint to prevent Booz Allen Hamilton’s $440 million acquisition of “agile and innovative” competitor EverWatch, Inc.[1] Among the notable aspects of the complaint is its definition of the relevant market as a single NSA contract and its assertion that the merger agreement itself constituted a violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Act. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 10:11 am by Allen Carter
” The Complaint seeks to enjoin these alleged Sherman Act violations. [read post]
30 Jun 2008, 12:19 pm
"This past week, Bower's lawyers filed a 65-page legal motion in Sherman's 15th state District Court detailing the scenario developed after Pearl came forward. [read post]
19 Jun 2013, 8:04 am by Allison Tussey
These investigations are being conducted by the Antitrust Division’s San Francisco Office and the FBI’s San Francisco Field Office. [read post]
4 Jul 2017, 3:20 am by NCC Staff
The others were George Read, Sherman, Robert Morris, George Clymer and James Wilson. 4. [read post]
26 Feb 2009, 3:32 pm
., No. 07-512 (Feb. 25, 2009) (LinkLine decision   here) unanimously rejected a price squeeze claim alleged under Section 2 of the Sherman Act. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 9:30 am
(Section 2 of the Sherman Act makes monopolization a felony.) [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 8:15 am by Rachel Dollar
Johnson of the FBI’s San Francisco Field Office. [read post]