Search for: "STATE v KENNEDY"
Results 2981 - 3000
of 7,329
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jan 2011, 6:50 pm
Kennedy: Crawford identifies the competing considerations here: on the one hand, Justice Kennedy “seems to like all that pomp and circumstance” (have you seen the rug in his chambers?) [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 2:11 pm
Evans and Lawrence v. [read post]
31 Jan 2007, 10:57 am
The reason links to my work seeking cert in US v. [read post]
21 Dec 2013, 7:37 am
Kennedy-Western University CA Appeals Court: Claims Under State Spam Statute Not Preempted by CAN-SPAM [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 1:07 pm
McIntyre Machinery, Ltd. v. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 2:35 pm
Today, in McCutcheon v. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 9:38 am
At Monday’s oral argument in Renico v. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 10:18 am
United States. [read post]
19 Jan 2018, 10:04 am
As Justice Kennedy noted in a recent concurrence, what it means to be "present" in a state may have taken on a different meaning. [read post]
30 Mar 2013, 1:12 pm
Justice Kennedy authored the opinion.) [read post]
2 Apr 2018, 1:20 pm
Encino Motorcars, LLC v. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 6:26 pm
In Hein v. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 12:19 pm
Justice Kennedy and Chief Justice Roberts got the ASG to commit that the government’s position necessitated a view that anybody charged with any crime, at any level – municipal, state or federal – could find their untainted assets frozen after being charged, and thus be unable to hire private counsel, solely for the purpose of paying a potential fine or money judgment in the event they were later convicted.The proposition clearly did not sit well with a number of… [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 6:02 pm
Like most Americans, I believe Roe v. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 8:35 am
This is stated in the statute. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 12:41 pm
In Miree v. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 6:47 pm
Lawrence v. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 1:55 pm
Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 4:25 am
United States, involving the prosecution of threats made on Facebook. [read post]
2 Jul 2008, 5:08 pm
In today's New York Times, Linda Greenhouse points out what appears to be a factual error in the Kennedy v. [read post]
