Search for: "STATE v. STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION"
Results 2981 - 3000
of 5,212
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Aug 2023, 11:41 am
"That's just called 'education.'" An official glossary of terms released by the state makes plain that the "anti-racist" views it mandates are highly ideological. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 12:00 am
Beer had stated in cross-examination that “there was obviously an agenda” in relation to allegations of corruption. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 10:56 am
He cited Kowalski v. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 5:35 pm
Board of Education, circa 1954. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 3:45 am
A selected Federal Government candidate will be assigned to the equivalent of Executive Schedule Level V. [read post]
26 Jan 2018, 9:43 am
V. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 2:55 am
To do so, said the court, would constitute an impermissible delegation of the State’s sovereign authority. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 11:04 am
Contrary to the defendant¹s contention, as stated by the Court of Appeals, ³[t]here is no requirement in Nallan [Nallan v. [read post]
12 Sep 2023, 6:30 am
" (Ibid., ¶30 iii - v). [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 8:52 am
Board of Education. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 10:56 am
Board of Education that they had to wait another year for justice. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 3:00 am
This Baker Donelson memo discusses Wadler v. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 1:04 pm
The latest is the landmark ruling by Justice Aylen of the Federal Court in Province of Alberta et al v. [read post]
26 Oct 2013, 7:09 pm
Board of Education of Topeka, 347 U.S. 483 (1954) ("Does segregation of children in public schools solely on the basis of race, even though the physical facilities and other "tangible" factors may be equal, deprive the children of the minority group of equal educational opportunities? [read post]
14 Dec 2018, 7:16 pm
The internet platform then standing in the role of the state, but the state can go after the enterprise where it fails in its monitoring and controlling functions. [read post]
5 May 2011, 10:42 am
" The decision indicates that "common interest warranting a qualified privilege" has been found to exist between employees of an organization [Loughry v Lincoln First Bank, 67 NY2d 369], members of a faculty tenure committee [Stukuls v State of New York, 42 NY2d 272], and employees of a board of education [Green v Kinsella, 36 AD2d 677]. [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 4:00 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.* Matter of the Arbitration between Professional, Clerical, Technical… [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 4:00 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.* Matter of the Arbitration between Professional, Clerical, Technical… [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 9:03 pm
The guidance, issued in the aftermath of the Dobbs v. [read post]
15 Sep 2024, 9:00 am
In Chackness v. [read post]
