Search for: "Shields v. Shields" Results 2981 - 3000 of 6,360
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Nov 2009, 9:10 pm
On the other hand, rogue cops who commit crimes shielded by their badges certainly would present a challenge to my resolve to defend anybody accused of a crime, although I would do it anyway. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 8:00 am by lawshucks
Among the career highlights noted is his work on Law Shucks favorite, the recent Airgas proxy fight (or as we like to call it, Wachtell v. [read post]
17 Jun 2008, 2:51 am
In Legal Bullshit of the Day posted at Feministe, we get a discussion about a loophole in the New York state rape shield law. [read post]
23 Jan 2008, 5:25 am
Accordingly, the court concluded that, by purchasing the paintball gun and then giving it to their son, the Gushees were negligent as a matter of law, and the only remaining question was whether that violation triggered Harley’s injuries.Since several questions remained unanswered, including whether the DiPilato’s actions as “an adult” absolved the Gushees from liability, the case against the Gushees was permitted to continue.Three guesses… [read post]
7 Dec 2007, 9:27 am
The answer is complicated by a long line of New York case precedent, most notably Weisman v Awnair Corp. decided by New York’s highest court in 1957, holding that a partnership may not exist where the business is conducted in corporate form, and parties may not be partners between themselves while using the corporate shield to protect themselves against personal liability. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 1:20 am
Kramarsky, a member of Dewey Pegno & Kramarsky, writes that the recent decision in Barclays Capital Inc. v. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 10:32 am
In Kreiner v Fischer, the state's highest court handed down a decision that has acted as a shield for negligent and drunk drivers, permitting them to cause serious injuries to innocent victims, with absolutely no consequence to the perpetrator nor remuneration to the victim. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 7:23 am by Written on behalf of Peter McSherry
To make an unattractive case even uglier, the employee had transferred assets to others in an apparent attempt to shield these properties, all of which were set aside. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 7:53 am by Howard Friedman
She summarized:The First Amendment shields CLS against state prohibition of the organization's expressive activity, however exclusionary that activity may be. [read post]