Search for: "Speed v. State"
Results 2981 - 3000
of 4,300
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Apr 2024, 6:02 am
In Huerta v. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 7:31 am
His friendships and emotional state were negatively impacted. [read post]
20 Dec 2015, 8:40 am
In Maryland, the state supreme court ruled in 1997 in Harris v. [read post]
27 Aug 2015, 7:37 am
Supreme Court (Tolan v. [read post]
7 Apr 2008, 5:13 pm
" [9] The major act of state case was Banco Nacional de Cuba v. [read post]
12 Apr 2015, 10:34 pm
The appellate court reviewed New Jersey law regarding how the state may prove impairment in a DWI case, and it affirmed the convictions in State v. [read post]
14 Nov 2018, 9:14 am
Additional Resources: Campbell v. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 1:43 am
It ruled in State v. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 3:13 pm
Specifically, Regulation 33 of the International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea (SOLAS) Chapter V states: The Master of a ship at sea which is in a position to be able to provide assistance on receiving a signal from any source that persons are in distress at sea, is bound to proceed with all speed to their assistance, if possible informing them or the Search and Rescue Service that the ship is doing so. [read post]
10 Dec 2017, 12:26 pm
Brady material gets its name from the landmark 1963 United States Supreme Court decision of Brady v. [read post]
6 Dec 2024, 10:29 am
Our Appellate Division recently considered the limits of Zoom proceedings in State v. [read post]
13 Nov 2024, 6:30 am
Beginning with the landmark 1938 decision in Erie v. [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 5:47 pm
Jan. 8, 2021) that Strojnik: “has filed thousands of disability discrimination cases against hotel defendants in state and federal courts,” Strojnik v. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 12:49 am
– General Court rejects appeal concerning speed reducing gearbox Case T-246/10 Francisco Ivars v OHIM – Motive intervening (Class 99) Nike in General Court: DYNAMIC SUPPORT and VICTORY RED: T-512/10, T-356/10 (Class 46) General Court: PIPELINE and absolute grounds: T-87/10 (Class 46) Is territoriality dead? [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 1:25 pm
Xavier Becerra and United States of America v. [read post]
24 Sep 2012, 5:00 am
Mar. 1, 2012), and in New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC d/b/a AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 5:20 am
Court of Appeal’s decision in September 2018 in Director of the Serious Fraud Office v. [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 9:52 am
Judges Inman and Griffin concurred. (1) Victim’s statements regarding identity of attacker were admissible as excited utterances despite possible passage of time between attack and statements; (2) Sixth Amendment confrontation argument not raised during trial was waived on appeal notwithstanding pretrial motion; (3) No abuse of discretion or prejudicial error in admission of testimony identifying defendant on a jail phone call and interpreting the contents of the call State… [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 11:47 am
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, January 17, 2008 US v. [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 1:13 pm
But two years later, the Supreme Court ruled in McGirt v. [read post]