Search for: "State v James"
Results 2981 - 3000
of 9,274
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jul 2007, 9:18 am
At least 25 states now apply Megan's Law, also known as a community-notification law, to juveniles, according to a recent survey by Brenda V. [read post]
14 Mar 2007, 8:01 am
Felicity Barringer of the NY Times reports today on yesterday's DC Circuit opinion in Sierra Club v. [read post]
8 Jan 2009, 5:53 am
See James v. [read post]
1 May 2012, 10:00 pm
" James & Jackson, LLC v. [read post]
12 Apr 2009, 10:57 am
Somers v. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 6:42 am
Today, the Court will hear oral argument in United States v. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 4:12 pm
City of Irvine v. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 12:32 pm
"James Oliphant, writing for the L.A. [read post]
13 Aug 2011, 10:02 am
See State v. [read post]
26 Nov 2023, 10:00 pm
’"Since “calendrical exactitude” wasn’t a requisite, the appellate court concluded that dismissal predicated on a violation of the “`time when’ requirement,” was improvidently granted, and the matter was sent the matter back for consideration of the State’s other grounds for having the case thrown out.Interestingly, when the CVA passed, Letitia James, the State’s Attorney General, released the following… [read post]
14 Aug 2013, 7:17 am
The narrow 5-4 decision in US v. [read post]
6 May 2016, 11:53 am
James H. [read post]
6 May 2016, 11:53 am
James H. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 7:09 am
Election Law Blog and Appellate Daily highlight snippets of Justice Stevens’ interview with 60 Minutes (which James mentioned yesterday). [read post]
22 Nov 2007, 6:42 am
(That is not a reason to think that Brown was a mistake: it is simply a consequence of how judicial protection of controversial rights claims usually works in the United States.).Lawrence v. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 6:30 am
The court may ‘continue the action, even though the state law under its statute of limitations might not allow relation back and would require dismissal.' 3A James Wm. [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 6:32 pm
In United States v. [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 8:15 am
As Baroness Hale DPSC said in Aintree University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust v James [2014] AC 591 , para 35: “The authorities are all agreed that the starting point is a strong presumption that it is in a person’s best interests to stay alive. [read post]
1 Jul 2008, 6:15 pm
" NFP criminal opinions today (2): James L. [read post]
22 Sep 2013, 7:58 am
United States v. [read post]
