Search for: "State v. Cash " Results 2981 - 3000 of 5,705
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Nov 2013, 5:14 am
Miller told Stocker he wanted to purchase the property with cash, but had run out of time to secure investors prior to closing and planned to pay off the loan within six months with investor funds. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 3:30 pm by Giles Peaker
”And finally, did:the combined effect of [R (Limbuela) -v- Secretary of State for the Home Department [2006] 1 AC 396 (HL(E)) ] and Clue establish that there is a free standing duty to accommodate and provide cash to a person like the Claimant who is within the boundaries of a local authority and whose Convention rights are threatened? [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 3:30 pm by Giles Peaker
”And finally, did:the combined effect of [R (Limbuela) -v- Secretary of State for the Home Department [2006] 1 AC 396 (HL(E)) ] and Clue establish that there is a free standing duty to accommodate and provide cash to a person like the Claimant who is within the boundaries of a local authority and whose Convention rights are threatened? [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 6:22 am by Joy Waltemath
Having received the state high court’s answers to those questions, the Second Circuit determined that, because shift supervisors did not have a “substantial” degree of “managerial responsibility,” they were akin to general wait staff and entitled to participate in the tip pool (Barenboim v Starbucks Corp, November 21, 2013, per curiam). [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 2:39 am by Laura Sandwell
From Wednesday 27 until Thursday 28 November is the appeal of R (Eastenders Cash and Carry plc & Ors) v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 2:39 am by Laura Sandwell
From Wednesday 27 until Thursday 28 November is the appeal of R (Eastenders Cash and Carry plc & Ors) v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 6:26 pm by Marta Requejo
Thus, the Spanish legislation should only prevail over the parties’ choice of a third-State law, but not over the choice of the law of a Member State. [read post]
17 Nov 2013, 10:09 am by Mark S. Humphreys
It is a 2004, case from the Houston Court of Appeals [1st Dist.] and is styled Hamby v. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 11:55 am by Kirk Jenkins
Our previews of the latest additions to the Illinois Supreme Court's civil docket continue with WISAM 1, d/b/a Sheridan Liquors v. [read post]