Search for: "State v. Court of Appeals, Division I"
Results 2981 - 3000
of 4,098
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Aug 2011, 11:16 pm
(August 31, 2011), the Court of Appeal (Second Appellate District, Division One) considered an appeal of a summary judgment ruling that ended Flagship's antitrust action. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 10:27 am
In particular, because of the Supreme Court’s recent opinion in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 7:00 am
Since the United States Supreme Court decided State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 5:30 pm
More generally, the Supreme Court in Employment Division v. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 5:08 pm
Iin the case of Channel Seven Sydney Pty Ltd v Senator Concetta Fierravanti-Wells [2011] NSWCA 246 the Court of Appeal in New South Wales reversed the order of Levy DCJ that the trial of the action proceed without a jury. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 4:00 am
It is this decision that is being appealed to the Supreme Court. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 5:15 pm
As I discussed in previous articles, earlier this year the United States Supreme Court adopted the "cat's paw" theory in federal cases, and the New Jersey Appellate Division adopted the cat's paw theory in November 2008. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 3:41 pm
For example, the Division I Court of Appeals relied on this statute in striking down portions of a King County ordinance that limited the amount of clearing an owner could do on a rural lot, finding that these restrictions were “an in kind indirect ‘tax, fee, or charge’ on development. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 3:23 am
Bernstein then appealed to the Appellate Division solely on substantive findings of the hearing officer related to the disciplinary charges sustained by the lower court. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 4:30 am
I guess if I had to pick one thing it is the feeling that there is a really clear division between “science” and other kinds of expertise. [read post]
20 Aug 2011, 4:00 am
Plaintiffs subsequently appealed from the district court's order granting the United States' motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 12:08 pm
In a recent opinion, the Third Division of the Fourth District of the California Court of Appeals reasoned that, by definition, a partnership requires at least two partners, and ruled that the withdrawal of one partner in a two-partner partnership automatically caused dissolution. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 2:21 am
Emanuel v. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 2:58 pm
I have now petitioned the court for rehearing to fix the misstatements of fact, law, and issues on appeal in their decision, and applied to them for certification of transfer to the Court of Appeals. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 9:30 am
Because pursuant to Rule 8.1(h), Arizona Rules of Civil Appellate Procedure (ARCAP), ‘[e]xpedited election appeals involving recalls … shall be filed in the Court of Appeals’ rather than this Court, IT IS ORDERED transferring this matter to the Arizona Court of Appeals, Division One. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 7:08 am
Supreme Court, in Employment Division v. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 12:48 pm
State of New Jersey v. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 2:05 pm
What Happened in the Mackle Vincent Shelton CaseIn a case out of the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida, Orlando Division, U.S. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 12:06 pm
SL v Westminster City Council & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 954 This is a significant judgment by the Court of Appeal on the ambit of s.21(1)(a) National Assistance Act 1948. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 12:06 pm
SL v Westminster City Council & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 954 This is a significant judgment by the Court of Appeal on the ambit of s.21(1)(a) National Assistance Act 1948. [read post]
