Search for: "State v. D. M. B." Results 2981 - 3000 of 3,627
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 May 2010, 9:34 am by Joseph C. McDaniel
(b) The filing of a petition under section 301, 302, or 303 of this title, or of an application under section 5(a)(3) of the Securities Investor Protection Act of 1970, does not operate as a stay—(1) under subsection (a) of this section, of the commencement or continuation of a criminal action or proceeding against the debtor;(2) under subsection (a)—(A) of the commencement or continuation of a civil action or proceeding—(i) for the establishment of paternity;(ii) for the… [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 12:24 am
According to the OECD Harmful Tax Competition: An Emerging Global Issue (1998 Tax Report) jurisdictions that (a) imposes no or only nominal taxes, (b) lacks policy of effective exchange information, (c) lacks transparency and (d) has no requirement of “substantial activity” is identified as a tax haven. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 6:00 am
Jump to County: A-B C D-G H-K L-M O-S T-W Jump to City: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 4:48 am by Broc Romanek
In fact, this guidance may very well have been issued as a result of those actions, particularly SEC v. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 10:03 pm by David M. McLain
This bill is an attempt to address a court decision, General Security Indemnity Company of Arizona v Mountain States Mutual Casualty Company 205 P.3D 529 (Colo. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 2:22 pm by Meg Martin
Armitage, Deputy Attorney General; D. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 6:00 am by Steven Peck
At the conclusion of the hearing, the trial court stated: "If I don't have an elder abuse case, I'm going to have one within a month. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 5:02 am by Andrew J. Batog
Ius de non evocando As the court in Pinochet notes with respect to crimes against the law of nations, there is a duty incumbent upon any potential forum state to defer to the proceedings of an international court or a court in a state which would otherwise have jurisdiction.[7] “Without question, the intervening entity or state must exercise great caution before concluding that intervention is necessary… …the emphasis must remain on… [read post]