Search for: "State v. David"
Results 2981 - 3000
of 14,227
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Sep 2019, 1:34 am
Consequently, the appellate court remanded the case to the trial court to allow it to reconsider this award (4 Pillar Dynasty LLC v. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 11:00 pm
“Tool Without A Handle: A Duty of Candor” The law and legal professional ethics require of counsel a duty of candor in the practice of law.[1] This includes a duty to not knowingly make false statements of fact, to not conceal controlling legal authority, and to not offer evidence the lawyer knows to be false.[2] These principles are considered essential to maintaining both substantive fairness for participants in the process, and trust in the integrity of the process for… [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 9:01 pm
In Baca v. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 10:29 am
This approach is more in keeping with the presidential system in, for example, the United States, and not consistent with the Westminster form of government, in which an election can occur at any time, with the approval of the Governor General. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 2:59 am
Halleck (cable public access channel not a state actor); Criminal forfeiture, where used, should track lines of individual owner and asset responsibility, not the loose all-for-one joint-and-several-liability standards of some civil litigation [Trevor Burrus on Cato certiorari petition in Peithman v. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 12:41 am
He refers to R (on the application of Miller and another) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union [2017] UKSC 5, noting it is consistent with the UK Government position. 1449: David Johnston QC refers to the Fixed Term Parliaments Act 2011 in accordance with which dissolution must take place. [read post]
30 Aug 2019, 5:57 am
The US Supreme Court’s decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
28 Aug 2019, 9:29 pm
This year’s program also adds a unique lunch discussion with Judge Rader and David Kappos on the state of the U.S. patent system (limited in-person availability), as well as in depth segment dedicated to licensing and monetization strategies. [read post]
28 Aug 2019, 7:20 am
See McPherson v. [read post]
26 Aug 2019, 5:42 pm
Facts: This case (Bamber v. [read post]
23 Aug 2019, 8:54 am
" See also Brown v. [read post]
22 Aug 2019, 9:31 am
For another case that takes the same view as Michigan, see State v. [read post]
20 Aug 2019, 2:03 pm
Riley v. [read post]
20 Aug 2019, 7:41 am
When I first heard about the confusion around the Ontario Court of Appeal’s decision in Hilson v. 1336365 Alberta Ltd. [read post]
19 Aug 2019, 12:04 am
An article by solicitor David Smith. [read post]
17 Aug 2019, 5:06 am
Emma DiNapoli and Jacques Singer-Emery chronicled the latest developments of the military commission in United States v. [read post]
17 Aug 2019, 5:02 am
And U.S. v. [read post]
15 Aug 2019, 12:28 pm
" But Carter picked the forceful Zbigniew Brzezinski as his national security adviser, and, by the time all was said and done—after early triumphs like Camp David were replaced by the Iran hostage and other crises—the Carter NSC staff had come to resemble Nixon's in influence and power. [read post]
15 Aug 2019, 4:02 am
Tucker Higgins reports at CNBC on friend-of-the-court briefs filed in support of the city in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. [read post]
14 Aug 2019, 10:56 am
In the case of Waste v. [read post]
