Search for: "State v. Doctor"
Results 2981 - 3000
of 9,595
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jun 2017, 12:37 pm
abstract_id=2110656. iii Paik et al., Do Doctors Practice Defensive Medicine, Revisited, NORTHWESTERN LAW & ECON RESEARCH PAPER NO. 13-20; Illinois Program in Law, Behavior and Social Science Paper No. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 8:04 pm
Evid. 702 (i.e. survives a challenge under Daubert v. [read post]
10 Jun 2017, 2:22 pm
Casual Corner, 620 So. 2d 792 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993), E/C was ordered to pay a doctor’s bill when the claimant, due to E/C’s inaction, was forced to seek self-help care after her authorized doctor retired. [read post]
9 Jun 2017, 1:18 pm
In a landmark case, the United States Supreme Court in Young v. [read post]
9 Jun 2017, 6:50 am
In Bradley v. [read post]
9 Jun 2017, 4:05 am
Williams, (WD MO, April 19, 2017) which preliminarily enjoined state law requirements that doctors who perform abortions have hospital admitting privileges, and that abortion clinics meet requirements for ambulatory surgical centers. [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 10:00 pm
She holds a bachelor’s degree in food technology from Texas Tech and master’s and doctoral degrees in food science from Oklahoma State University. [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 9:01 pm
That was and will be the broadest statute to revive SOLs in the United States, because the Supreme Court considered the law and held that criminal SOLs may not be revived, because that would violate the Ex Post Facto Clause in Stogner v. [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 10:44 am
He’s on a different mission now: When he calls on doctors, he champions generic drugs. [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 2:55 am
In Tileston v. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court in Gonzales v. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 12:50 pm
In Tavarez v Jarett, --- F.Supp.3d ----, 2017 WL 2304029 (S.D. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 5:32 am
One of the plaintiff’s pre-doctoral interns returned as a post-doc and asked the plaintiff to supervise her. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 12:47 pm
The Fourth Circuit ruled last week in IRAP v. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 9:01 am
He denied using the drug and submitted a urine sample to a private doctor, whose test came up negative (the test had a higher threshold for a positive result), but his employer refused to consider the new results. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 6:20 am
Facts: This case (Wendell v. [read post]
31 May 2017, 9:08 am
Under the Kentucky Hazel v. [read post]
31 May 2017, 8:00 am
Basanti v. [read post]
29 May 2017, 10:28 am
Finney v. [read post]
26 May 2017, 6:58 am
DeAnne then took Kathryn to a doctor for a medical examination. [read post]
