Search for: "State v. Dominic" Results 2981 - 3000 of 4,510
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Nov 2020, 7:35 am by Kristian Soltes
’s V 2.65% $5.3 billion deal to acquire Plaid Inc., a key player in the financial-technology space. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 12:51 am
The Ninth Circuit arguably erred because, while relying on the US Supreme Court’s decision in Campbell v Acuff-Rose Music (92-1292), 510 US 569 (1994), it overlooked the part of  Campbellin which the majority stated that the defence of fair use may apply to a satire if “there is little or no risk of market substitution [of the original work with the later work], whether because of the large extent of transformation of the earlier work, . . . [read post]
7 Apr 2013, 7:26 pm
  He described the circuit split leading to FTC v Actavis currently pending in the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
29 Nov 2020, 4:13 pm by INFORRM
Investigative website Open Democracy uncovered details of the Cabinet Office during  months of research for a report on the state of Freedom of Information. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 3:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
Justice Emerson declined to follow Bouhayer, stating that it has not been followed by other courts and that it is contrary to the demand-futility test established in Marx v. [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
” I have no particular brief for high Federalists from New England, but I do wonder what we might think had Garrison actually been influential and several New England states accepted his view and tried to secede, say, after the Supreme Court’s decision in Prigg v. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 9:52 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Dominant online businesses have to shoulder responsibility for bad behavior, including IP theft. [read post]
9 Jan 2010, 4:12 am by Daniel E. Cummins
")In The Driver's SeatPost-Koken decision making dominated the field of auto insurance law in 2009By Daniel E. [read post]
30 Oct 2016, 5:05 pm by INFORRM
Dominic Ponsford in the Press Gazette said that IMPRESS differs little from IPSO but that “the state should not force publishers into it. [read post]
21 Jul 2019, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
The barrister sued various members of the Bar Council, including David Barniville who was later appointed a High Court judge, claiming defamation, breach of constitutional rights and of competition law by use of a dominant position. [read post]