Search for: "State v. Eugene" Results 2981 - 3000 of 5,938
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Dec 2018, 6:21 pm by Eugene Volokh
Finally, as promised, here is an illustration, the only New Hampshire criminal libel appellate decision in the past 100 years, State v. [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 8:02 am by Andrew Hamm
He was not able to avoid the issue in Buck v. [read post]
15 Dec 2018, 5:15 pm by Josh Blackman
Eugene was kind enough to let me write several posts about this important ruling. [read post]
14 Dec 2018, 9:04 am by Eugene Volokh
The "questionable" "editing choices," the court said, weren't sufficiently injurious to reputation to qualify as libelous (whether or not they conveyed a false message).From yesterday's Fourth Circuit decision in Virginia Citizens Defense League v. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 3:01 am by Walter Olson
Fourth Circuit rejects gag order on parties and potential witnesses in North Carolina hog farm litigation [Eugene Volokh] Eighth Circuit, interpreting Missouri law’s obligation to register as “lobbyist,” leaves open possibility that requirement extends to unpaid lobbyists, also known as concerned citizens [Jason Hancock, Kansas City Star; Institute for Free Speech on Calzone v. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 1:30 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
" The law review has now published a transcript of the keynote address by the Honorable Eugene M. [read post]
25 Nov 2018, 3:52 pm by Ilya Somin
As Eugene describes in some detail, the Supreme Court initially refused to apply the Bill of Rights to the states, even after the Fourteenth Amendment. [read post]
20 Nov 2018, 1:58 pm by Eugene Volokh
Policing such behavior, the court concludes, is a matter for the states, because it isn't authorized as a regulation of commerce or as necessary and proper to comply with treaties.The decision, handed down today, is U.S. v. [read post]
20 Nov 2018, 1:58 pm by Eugene Volokh
Policing such behavior, the court concludes, is a matter for the states, because it isn't authorized as a regulation of commerce or as necessary and proper to comply with treaties.The decision, handed down today, is U.S. v. [read post]