Search for: "State v. Public Service Commission" Results 2981 - 3000 of 4,897
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 May 2007, 1:21 pm
Upon every writing which is the subject of a notarial act, the notary shall, after his certificate, state the date of the expiration of his commission in substantially the following form:"My commission expires the . . . . day of . . . . . ., . . . .. [read post]
24 Oct 2021, 4:17 pm by INFORRM
IPSO IPSO has published four rulings since our last Round Up: 00006-21 Hackett v Hull Daily Mail, 1 Accuracy (2019), Breach – sanction: publication of correction 04283-21 Friel v thejc.com, 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation 05855-21 Duah v metro.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2019), 3 Harassment (2019), 12 Discrimination (2019), No breach – after investigation 07938-21 various v express.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2019), Breach –… [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 6:39 am by Karin Retzer
Federal Trade Commission’s staff report on Mobile Privacy Disclosures (February 2012). [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 5:05 am by Jim Sedor
Here’s Why That Won’t Happen.Center for Public Integrity – Sarah Kleiner | Published: 8/31/2017 Seizing on the specter of Russian election influence, Democrats have ramped up their quixotic effort to blunt Citizens United v. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 9:04 pm by The Regulatory Review Staff
Supreme Court’s landmark environmental decision in Michigan v. [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 9:03 pm by Henry Miller
The new policies require the commission to assess the climate impacts of pending projects. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 7:56 am by INFORRM
The complaint was upheld by the Commission. [read post]
25 May 2012, 7:21 pm by Law Lady
The state's Health and Human Services Commission initiated a rule last year barring it from contracting with entities affiliated with abortion providers.Putting the state rule on hold until he can hear full arguments in the case.Medical Devices/Patents: CORDIS TO APPEAL $40 MILLION JUDGMENT IN STENT PATENT CASE, Boston Scientific Corp. v. [read post]
24 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  The Judges’ Bill “decisively reoriented the institutional function of the Court toward the management of the law and its reception by the general legal public,” Post explains, and as jurisprudential ideas, controversial issues, and the Court’s membership evolved over the coming decades they sparked ever sharper divisions among the justices. [read post]