Search for: "State v. Saide" Results 2981 - 3000 of 57,172
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Oct 2010, 3:51 pm by PaulKostro
However, when a state exercises personal jurisdiction over a defendant in a suit that arises out of the defendant’s contact with that state, it is said to be exercising specific jurisdiction. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 1:51 pm by Howard Friedman
Reporting on the oral arguments, the Washington Post said in part:Two appeals court judges clearly stated that there is no way to view the Peace Cross in Bladensburg other than as a symbol of Christianity.The third judge on the appeals panel just as strongly said that the marble-and-cement monument is a secular war memorial honoring the death and sacrifice of those lost in battle.Yesterday the 4th Circuit also heard oral arguments in EEOC v. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 7:37 am
I previously posted here about a case in front of the United States Supreme Court that deals with how far does the rule from Georgia v. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 4:00 am
Considering the “serious nature” of the Supervisor’s misconduct, the court said that the penalty imposed, dismissal,  did not shock its sense of fairness, citing Kelly v Safir, 96 NY2d 32 and  Berenhaus v Ward, 70 NY2d 436. [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 2:45 pm
  Kathryn Landry, arguing for the State, said that the Miranda warning the police read to Mr. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 7:34 am by WIMS
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas. [read post]
22 May 2015, 2:13 pm
Judge Kozinski has written compelling and impressive dissents before—the 1993 White v. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 2:36 pm by RiskProf
Funding that debt will be difficult, Dartland said. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 2:36 pm by RiskProf
Funding that debt will be difficult, Dartland said. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 11:42 am by Wells Bennett
The long-running habeas case of Abdullah v. [read post]
12 Aug 2012, 10:30 pm
 Justice Scalia said as much in dissent, and while one might dismiss a dissenter's effort to exaggerate the implications of the majority's reasoning, subsequent state court cases--especially the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court's ruling in Goodridge v. [read post]