Search for: "Strange v. Strange" Results 2981 - 3000 of 3,726
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Nov 2009, 5:00 am
This is the first in a series of posts on United States v. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 7:41 am
Having only recently reviewed the logo sponsorship deal in Force India v Etihad (see earlier post here), the IPKat finds himself perusing Hudson Bay Apparel Brands LLC v Umbro International Ltd [2009] EWHC B28 (Ch), a Chancery Division (England and Wales) decision of Deputy Judge Mark Herbert QC, dating back to 4 November 2009.Umbro, an English company [owned by Nike] which enjoyed the fruits of an international licensing business based principally on football products, owned the… [read post]
11 Nov 2009, 3:19 pm
They write: The Supreme Court's 2005 decision in Kelo v. [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 9:54 pm by Simon Gibbs
  If only.The correct approach was indentified by the Court of Appeal in Lownds v Home Office [2002] EWCA Cic 365:“what is required is a two-stage approach. [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 2:24 pm
There was argument yesterday (Thursday) in the Supreme Court in Pottawattamie County v. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 5:29 pm
The oral argument in Pottawattamie County v. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 1:00 pm
  When re-reading Thorner v Major (links to our post) and Yeoman’s Row v Cobbe (again, links to our post) for that purpose, a rather important side-issue emerges about whether proprietary estoppel can be used to “get around” section 2, LP(MP)A 1989. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 3:16 pm
I elected to pull up Brown v. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 1:47 am by Christopher Barnes
One of the most common shortcuts is the copy & paste function (good 'ol "ctrl-c" then "ctrl-v"). [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 6:52 pm
When our phone rang with a strange number this afternoon, and the voice on the other end had a Nigerian accent, we were relieved. [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 6:09 pm by JB
Scalia was never directly quoted saying something like, "I think Brown v. [read post]