Search for: "United States v. Burden"
Results 2981 - 3000
of 9,858
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jul 2021, 9:09 am
Pakdel v City and County of San Francisco, No. 20–1212, 594 U. [read post]
17 Sep 2016, 4:00 am
Insurance companies are coming under increasing pressure due to the recent proliferation of natural disasters in the United States. [read post]
28 Jan 2008, 10:06 am
The United States Supreme Court has agreed to hear two new employment discrimination cases this term. [read post]
16 Mar 2021, 6:00 am
This language came dangerously close to swallowing an industry extolled for democratizing science and helping the United States overcome its PPE shortage in the heart of the COVID-19 outbreak. [read post]
10 Dec 2007, 12:42 pm
United States v. [read post]
6 Nov 2007, 8:18 am
Guglielmino v McKee Foods Corporation, No. 05-16144 (9th Cir. [read post]
21 Sep 2018, 4:47 am
Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., No. 18-189 (Three good questions): Whether Administrative Patent Judges of the [PTAB] are principal Officers of the United States who must be appointed by the President with the advice and consent of the Senate under the Appointments Clause. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 3:07 pm
V. [read post]
20 Mar 2016, 9:49 am
LEXIS 31607 (ND NY, March 8, 2016), a New York federal magistrate judge concluded that challenges by a corrections officer to a Muslim inmate's right to wear a beard did not impose a substantial burden on the inmate's ability to practice his religion.In Williams v. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 6:45 am
In response, Waterstone Mortgage filed a motion to stay “until the United States Supreme Court reaches a decision in the consolidated cases of Ernst & Young, LLP v. [read post]
17 Nov 2020, 7:40 pm
On this reading, the Court’s racial discrimination mean “not merely that race was important but that the burden on the people who are rejected because of race is an interest that the state could seek to protect, that a rejection on the basis of race or any protected category creates a st [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 11:27 am
The North Carolina Court of Appeals decided a significant case yesterday, ruling in State v. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 11:27 am
The North Carolina Court of Appeals decided a significant case yesterday, ruling in State v. [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 3:04 pm
United States v. [read post]
4 Nov 2023, 4:02 pm
The case could set up a major test for gun rights for the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 1:23 pm
ECF No. 80; see also United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 9:34 am
(Rehnquist was recused).The contrast with United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 11:32 am
” Given that vast land areas of the United States are part of the migratory bird flyways, the court’s opinion paves the way for all of these areas to become critical habitat for listed species. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 6:59 am
In Washington v. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 5:10 am
Hearsay is not allowed as evidence in the United States, unless one of [a number of] exceptions applies to the particular statement being made. [read post]
