Search for: "United States v. David"
Results 2981 - 3000
of 6,865
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Mar 2016, 3:39 am
United States and the judicial-recusal case Williams v. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 7:03 am
Ratonel et al v. [read post]
28 Feb 2016, 4:09 pm
David Price, solicitor QC at David Price Solicitors and Advocates, is taking a sabbatical from 7 March and his firm is not taking on any new cases. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 4:36 pm
In 1968, a court decision, Escott v. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 2:15 pm
General Martins begins by calling Judge Pohl’s attention to the ‘ten-category framework’ from his 2014 discovery order in United States v. al Nashiri. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 1:48 pm
Judge David W. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 7:18 am
The high court in in 2012 dismissed as “improvidently granted review” First American v. [read post]
21 Feb 2016, 4:28 pm
On the same day Sir David Eady handed down judgment in Wasserman v Freilich. [read post]
20 Feb 2016, 12:33 pm
To support this position, Ryan cites an Eighth Circuit case, United States v Barrow, in which the court required a “deficiency in appointed counsel’s representation,” rather than simple “unwillingness … to communicate with counsel,” as well as the arguably similar cases of Stenson v Lambert and Hunter v Delo. [read post]
18 Feb 2016, 10:59 am
United States, 533 U.S. 27 (2001), Justice Scalia applied the rule first formulated in Katz v. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 8:33 pm
On February 11, 2016, in Kuehl v. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 4:38 pm
Batoff of Obermayer Rebmann Maxwell & Hippel on their HR Legalist Disney’s Influence on United States Copyright Law – Sacramento lawyer Josh H. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 5:19 am
In his 1995 decision for a unanimous Court in United States v. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 2:12 pm
Immprofs Rubenstein & Gulasakarem At Yale’s Notice-and-Comment blog, immprof David Rubenstein suggests that United States v. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 10:27 am
” At Notice & Comment, David Rubenstein argues that United States v. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 8:30 am
Bush v. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 8:08 am
JacksonAt the end of January, the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut issued a decision in the matter of Roth Staffing Companies, L.P. v. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 8:08 am
Jackson At the end of January, the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut issued a decision in the matter of Roth Staffing Companies, L.P. v. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 1:56 am
Their legal counsel Jacob Rogers, said the removal was the result of an overreach of U.S. copyright law but believes that they have no other option than to comply saying “Today, in an unfortunate example of the overreach of the United States’ current copyright law, the Wikimedia Foundation removed the Dutch-language text of The Diary of a Young Girl” adding “We took this action to comply with the United States’ Digital… [read post]
15 Feb 2016, 9:01 pm
For example, in a recent case, McQuistion v. [read post]
