Search for: "We Don't Judge - We Defend"
Results 2981 - 3000
of 6,918
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Dec 2010, 6:19 am
Don't ask. [read post]
26 Feb 2008, 8:49 am
We don't. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 6:35 pm
But we'll be honest- we're not sure we would have had the guts Judge Leebow had- and we don't think she was correct. [read post]
22 Nov 2006, 12:05 pm
Third: In a democracy, don't appointed judges, with life-time tenure have an obligation to respect legislation in particular rather than substituting their own judgment about the "best" outcome? [read post]
30 Sep 2024, 5:01 am
You don't get to object[,]" but assured Appellant that the court would "give [her] the opportunity to present [her] side. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 2:26 am
You don't offer friendship. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 4:29 pm
Simply because they can also provide information doesn't make them not a fundamental part of the technical implementation. [read post]
28 Aug 2010, 3:49 am
Weren't you listening judge? [read post]
17 Oct 2018, 5:00 am
In 2009, defending his administration’s decision to try 9/11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed in civilian court, Obama suggested that Mohammed would get the death penalty: “I don't think [the civilian trial] will be offensive at all when he's convicted and when the death penalty is applied to him. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 1:17 pm
They handle these situations with professionalism, and don't let the casual cruelty, callousness, and hatred that they read or hear about get them down. . . . [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 6:48 am
But we digress.The Fifth Circuit didn't have to decide that question either, because the deficient settlement agreement didn't address this issue in any concrete fashion. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 3:02 pm
Maybe it's because most of the facts in criminal cases are bad, and we don't want to reveal them. [read post]
17 Aug 2007, 5:57 am
" But we didn't write this order; we're just reporting about it.) [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 7:38 pm
If the judge agrees on May 20, the obstruction conviction won't stand. [read post]
10 Dec 2021, 9:51 am
As it happens, the Court of Appeals (Livingston, Kearse and Sack) ruled the trial court made significant errors in admitting certain evidence against the police officers, but that these errors do not warrant a new trial because the errors were harmless in light of the strength of the case and other factors.As this is a summary order, we don't have a full statement of facts. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 11:04 am
Judge Pohn sums up the government’s position: “[W]e give you what we have and the rest just doesn’t exist. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 7:00 am
The problem is that the forms used for these situations don't necessarily translate, based on the specific business concerns underpinning the relationship. [read post]
12 Jul 2009, 12:05 pm
But Judge Everingham noted that the court's task here was complicated by the fact that there are multiple defendants in this case and only BiTEK was culpable. [read post]
2 May 2009, 5:45 am
In many ways it poses more of an embarrassment, even, than Judge Keller's "We close at 5" imbroglio because so many members of the court were colleagues of Judge Holland, so it will look like they're all protecting her if they don't go along with Judge Brewer's findings and give Hood a new trial.If I were a betting man, I'd wager this will be a 5-4 ruling, but… [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 4:15 am
You can't cross-examine a speed camera, but if you try really hard, it's possible to beat the camera at its own game. [read post]
