Search for: "Weeks v. State of Me."
Results 2981 - 3000
of 6,234
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Mar 2016, 9:01 pm
In Buckley v. [read post]
28 Oct 2009, 12:40 am
Yesterday, Yale lawprof Jack Balkin had to backtrack:As I suspected, Justice Scalia did not say he would have dissented in Brown v. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 3:48 am
Finally, in State v. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 1:12 am
In particular, I noted that in Davis v. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 2:27 pm
The United States Supreme Court has ruled on two drug dog cases in the last few weeks: Florida v. [read post]
6 Jan 2008, 2:39 pm
We are using Mauet's Trial Techniques as our main textbook, two NITA casebooks, State v. [read post]
14 May 2010, 11:51 am
Kaui Jochanan Amsterdam v. [read post]
19 Dec 2008, 2:45 pm
Ice, which deals with Blakely's applicability to consecutive sentencing determinations, and United States v. [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 3:27 am
The issue in State v. [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 9:02 am
Here are the facts: In 1997, State Farm Insurance Company got clobbered with a $1 billion class-action judgment in Avery v. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 11:45 am
Cefetra BV, Cefetra Feed Service BV, Cefetra Futures BV and State of Argentina and Monsanto Technology LLC v. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 3:09 pm
Aww… come over here, Dallas, and give me a big hug. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 6:36 am
The court has been holding all three for last week’s big decision in Cooper v. [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 9:01 pm
The Facts in Vance v. [read post]
[Eugene Volokh] Can Repeated Speech Be Criminalized Just Because It's Intended to "Seriously Annoy"?
19 Dec 2017, 8:10 am
(New York), State v. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 5:22 pm
In Texas Entertainment Association Inc. v. [read post]
30 May 2016, 9:01 pm
Last Monday, the Supreme Court decided Foster v. [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 4:33 am
Let me know something. [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 3:01 am
In a March 3, 2014 order (here), the Court granted the defendant’s petition for writ of certiorari in Indiana State District Council of Laborers v. [read post]
3 Jan 2022, 12:58 am
Just last week, the Appellate Division, Second Department in Weinstein v Levine applied the direct-derivative dichotomy to an issue that frequently arises in business divorce litigation when the defendants who control the company checkbook use company funds to pay their personal legal fees. [read post]
