Search for: "Will v. United States" Results 2981 - 3000 of 91,954
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Feb 2013, 2:22 pm by The Federalist Society
The question in this case is whether Congress’s 2006 decision to reauthorize Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act under the pre-existing coverage formula of Section 4(b) of the Voting Rights Act exceeded its authority under the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments and thus violated the Tenth Amendment and Article IV of the United States Constitution.To discuss the case, we have Michael Carvin, who is a Partner at Jones Day.- See more at:… [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 2:22 pm by The Federalist Society
The question in this case is whether Congress’s 2006 decision to reauthorize Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act under the pre-existing coverage formula of Section 4(b) of the Voting Rights Act exceeded its authority under the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments and thus violated the Tenth Amendment and Article IV of the United States Constitution.To discuss the case, we have Michael Carvin, who is a Partner at Jones Day.- See more at:… [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 3:08 pm
United States, No. 07-13; Monette v. [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 2:46 pm by Lawrence S. Goldman
United States (12-464, decided February 25, 2014), the Supreme Court by a 6-3 vote extended the rulings of United States v. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 11:00 am
United States, No. 08-830, and the pro se IFP cert petition in Robertson v. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 6:36 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
Arkansas Valley Adventures, January 6, 2016, United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit More Blog Entries: Wilkins v. [read post]
18 Dec 2010, 11:50 am by Charon QC
The United States appears to have a few ‘issues’ with judicial systems that do not fall within their control. [read post]
25 Jun 2021, 3:48 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The respondent, General Dynamics United Kingdom Ltd (“General Dynamics”), seeks to enforce an arbitration award of over £16 million plus interest and costs (“the Award”) made in 2016 by an International Chamber of Commerce arbitral tribunal against the appellant, the State of Libya (“Libya”). [read post]