Search for: "Williams v. Federal District Court" Results 2981 - 3000 of 3,647
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Mar 2010, 4:05 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
., WILLIAM KOLSHORN, and JERSEYSEARCH TITLE SERVICES, INC., Defendants. - as consolidated with - CONESTOGA TITLE INSURANCE CO., WILLIAM KOLSHORN, and JERSEYSEARCH TITLE SERVICES, INC., As is common in Federal District Court cases, there are complaints, and then amended complaints and so on. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 5:25 am by Susan Brenner
Lee asked the trial court for a rehearing on the order requiring him to undergo surgery given this new evidence; he lost at the trial court level and before the Virginia Supreme Court, but a federal district court judge enjoined the surgery and the U.S. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 12:31 am
The company will also pay $4.5 million to cover the studios' legal fees and costs for the copyright fight that ensued in California federal court. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 4:00 pm
Posner, one of the most prolific members of the federal judiciary and a judge in the federal appeals court in Chicago -- kicked off a highly unusual day in United States District Court in Brooklyn. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 12:34 am
Eight months after a New Jersey federal judge ordered fees shifted in U.S. v. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 7:57 am by Steve Hall
Mark White and former FBI director and federal Judge Williams Sessions – asked the court to take the case. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 9:42 am by Howard Knopf
Trigg and Joseph Petersen at Kilpatrick, Stockton have written about a recent decision of a US Federal Court Judge William Pauley III in the highly regarded Southern District of New York Federal Court. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 6:44 am
Federal Court Equity Receivership”:  The Business Bankruptcy Panel       Featured Panelists: The Honorable Paul W. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 2:47 pm
The January 20 decision in Trusted Integration, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 6:53 pm
Johnson was deceptively designed to look like a third party seal of approval could not be dismissed on the grounds that injury was not sufficiently alleged and that no reasonable consumer could have found the label misleading, the federal district court in San Jose has ruled.Under the California Unfair Competition Law and False Advertising Law, suit may only be brought by a person who has suffered injury in fact and has lost money or property as a result of a violation. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 11:58 am by mjpetro
And the reference in Rule 12(e) to "the court" must be to the district court, not the court of appeals, for Rule 12 as a whole governs pretrial proceedings in federal district courts. [read post]