Search for: "Williams v. Justice Court" Results 2981 - 3000 of 5,965
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jul 2022, 1:54 am by INFORRM
According to the Ministry of Justice, this includes a new tool for the courts to throw out meritless claims quicker and a cap on costs to prevent the rich from “bullying” journalists with the threat of expensive litigation. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 6:35 am by James Bickford
Press-Enterprise, Ben Goad reports on the possible impact of the Court’s decision in the prison overcrowding case Brown v. [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 1:07 pm by Mark Walsh
It is now 10:28 a.m., and the chief justice says, “I have the opinion of the court in No. 23-939, Trump v. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 11:30 am
William Taft was the only President to also serve as a Supreme Court Justice. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Yet Justice Thomas is the most ideologically conservative justice on the Court. [read post]
20 Feb 2020, 7:33 am by John Rubin
Applying the North Carolina Supreme Court’s reasoning from State v. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 7:46 am by Kiran Bhat
William Jefferson’s congressional office may get a belated review” by the Court. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
Supreme Court's use of history (and various reflections on the use of history in judicial decisionmaking) in the recently decided Second Amendment case United States v. [read post]
23 May 2013, 5:55 pm by Rumpole
Mark our words, this has the potential, to quote Chief Justice William Howard Taft, "to be a real pain in the ass." [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 4:27 am by Jon Hyman
Late last week, the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals, in Evans v. [read post]
6 Aug 2010, 6:53 am by Ted Frank
(Shannon Duffy, "Discovery Rule for Libel Doesn't Apply to Blogs, Says Federal Judge", Legal Intelligencer, Aug. 6; White & Williams press release, Aug. 5; Simple Justice blog). [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 1:11 am
Accordingly, I do not understand the decision of the European Court of Justice in Infopaq to have qualified the long standing test” [i.e. the very low originality standard established by University of London Press and by Ladbroke v William Hill]. [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 6:52 am by Andrew Hamm
” In an op-ed in the Washington Examiner, Kevin Theriot urges the court in National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. [read post]