Search for: "Apple, Inc  " Results 3001 - 3020 of 5,453
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jun 2011, 11:45 am by Alex Gasser
., Ltd. of South Korea, and several of its affiliated entities (collectively, “Samsung”) as well as several downstream manufacturers such as Apple, Inc. of Cupertino, California, Research In Motion Ltd. of Canada, and Sirius XM Radio, Inc. through infringement of U.S. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 9:39 am by The Docket Navigator
Apple, Inc., 2-08-cv-00104 (TXED September 24, 2010, Order) (Everingham, M.J.) [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 7:12 am by Sheldon Toplitt
Sorry, but at least "TUOL" showed admirable restraint when Apple debuted the iPad. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 8:57 am by Phil
The justices yesterday unanimously rejected calls from Microsoft and its allies, including Apple Inc. and Google Inc. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 6:20 am by Deb Givens
House Judiciary Committee on Friday requested information from Apple Inc. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 10:07 pm by Kyle Hulten
Whitman gained $980,000 in “ill-gotten profits” as a result of the insider trading of stocks including Google and Polycom, Inc. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 5:15 am by Barry Sookman
As Google Inc carries on business principally in the US, the claimants had to obtain the permission of the court to sue Google in the UK. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 4:11 pm by Eric Schweibenz
By way of background, the Complainant in this investigation is HTC Corporation (“HTC”) and the Respondent is Apple Inc. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 9:14 am by Alex Gasser
In Order No. 16 (dated December 6, 2010), ALJ Rogers denied Respondent Eastman Kodak Company’s (“Kodak”) motion to strike a portion of a supplemental expert report filed on behalf of Complainant Apple, Inc. [read post]
31 May 2022, 1:33 pm by Leonard L. Gordon and Joshua Nace
” Without addressing the criticisms cited in their colleagues’ concurring statement, and with an almost irreverent tone, Khan and Slaughter commented that “charting and tallying may have some visual appeal, but it is no substitute for case-by-case analysis, nor can it make apples-to-apples out of oranges and bananas. [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 2:44 am by Shane McCall
In other words, the government estimate and other offeror’s price didn’t meet all the government requirements, so it wasn’t an apples to apples comparison. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 10:42 am by Bethany Berger
Cougar Den Inc. showed yet again that federal Indian law cases often diverge from familiar progressive-conservative divides. [read post]
23 Apr 2008, 8:25 am
He alleged that the Defendants, WalMart Stores, Inc., Apple, Inc., RealNetworks, Inc., Taco Tunes, Inc., Ramones Productions, Inc., Estate of John Cummings (a/k/a Johnny Ramone), Herzog & Strauss and Ira Herzog, all infringed on Reinhardt's copyright to six songs penned while one of The Ramones, by digitally distribution. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 9:04 am
Cir. 1998).Ex parte Kuijper Appeal 2014-000569; Appl. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 8:26 am
Cir. 1998).Ex parte Kuijper Appeal 2014-000569; Appl. [read post]