Search for: "Attorney General v. Superior Court"
Results 3001 - 3020
of 3,267
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Oct 2008, 11:00 pm
So far, there are a dozen letters on file urging the court to review the case, including one from the California State Legislature and the Attorney General. [read post]
30 Sep 2008, 5:43 pm
The trial court's section 1988 attorney fee award is therefore affirmed. [read post]
30 Sep 2008, 12:08 pm
Superior Court (2007) 149 Cal.App.4th 554 and Puerto v. [read post]
18 Sep 2008, 9:13 pm
Court of Appeals decided in April to let a district judge's ruling stand in another Molski case - Molski v. [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 7:30 pm
County Supreme Court issued a ruling on September 10 in Taylor v. [read post]
11 Sep 2008, 2:21 am
In July of 2007, I was the attorney for the defendant in the divorce of Sullivan v. [read post]
10 Sep 2008, 1:25 pm
Chief Justice Steele: This began with a case I was assigned while on the Court of Chancery, Gotham v. [read post]
10 Sep 2008, 12:30 pm
Finding that this case falls squarely within the definitional exclusion of CAFA, the court ultimately held that AOL cannot remove this private attorney general suit to federal court pursuant to CAFA. [read post]
6 Sep 2008, 3:03 am
Chief Justice Steele: This began with a case I was assigned while on the Court of Chancery, Gotham v. [read post]
1 Sep 2008, 6:45 pm
McKee v. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 8:52 pm
In Citizens Bank v. [read post]
27 Aug 2008, 3:43 am
There is, however, an exception to this general rule, and that is why the court's third point was correct. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 10:09 pm
This causes all sorts of problems for court officers and attorneys who seize vehicles. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 10:09 pm
This causes all sorts of problems for court officers and attorneys who seize vehicles. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 4:03 pm
In Pearson Dental v. [read post]
22 Aug 2008, 1:58 pm
But Riverside also has a Federal Court outpost, and that's where they've been trying the Mattel v. [read post]
22 Aug 2008, 1:00 pm
In May 2006, following a bench trial, the Superior Court of California found the Attorney General's lawsuit preempted by federal law. [read post]
22 Aug 2008, 10:41 am
The Pennsylvania intermediate Superior Court had also applied the Supreme Court’s standing rule to the catch-all provision, see Debbs v. [read post]
20 Aug 2008, 6:38 pm
Crawford v Weather Shield Mfg, Inc. (2008) 44 Cal.4th 541 The Indemnity Provision The indemnity provision at issue was contained in a construction subcontract prepared by the developer, builder, and general contractor of a large Huntington Beach residential project, J.M. [read post]
19 Aug 2008, 8:28 pm
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, August 15, 2008 Chhay v. [read post]
