Search for: "BARRETT" Results 3001 - 3020 of 6,527
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Nov 2020, 9:04 am by DONALD SCARINCI
The post Justice Barrett Joins Court in Hearing Oral Arguments in Five Cases appeared first on Constitutional Law Reporter. [read post]
16 Nov 2020, 7:04 am by James Romoser
Here’s a round-up of other Supreme Court-related news and commentary from around the web: Case on Churches, Cuomo and Coronavirus Arrives at Supreme Court (Adam Liptak, The New York Times) The Supreme Court’s Obamacare Bait and Switch (Simon Lazarus & Robert Litan, The New Republic) Justice Barrett’s Remote Arguments Yield Only Hints of Approach (Kimberly Strawbridge Robinson, Bloomberg Law) The Shadows of the Constitution (NPR, Throughline podcast) Takings and Time… [read post]
15 Nov 2020, 4:31 pm by Vin Bonventre
  Back to now-Justice Barrett.)Yuri Gripas/Abaca Press/TNSIn her three years as a federal appellate judge, Amy Coney Barrett established a distinct record. [read post]
15 Nov 2020, 4:05 pm by Nassiri Law
Of course, this was before the death of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg and her subsequent replacement by conservative Justice Amy Coney Barrett. [read post]
14 Nov 2020, 5:46 pm by Howard Bashman
“Yale legal experts dive into Barrett’s addition to the Supreme Court”: Julia Brown of The Yale Daily News has this report. [read post]
13 Nov 2020, 3:30 pm by Guest Blogger
Justice Barrett articulated the widespread consensus that the Court would soundly reject a claim for a religious exemption to discriminate based on race (“I think we would agree that there’s really not any circumstance we can think of in which racial discrimination would be permitted as a religious exemption. [read post]
13 Nov 2020, 9:18 am
The court’s new 6-3 conservative majority, cemented with the recent appointment of Justice Amy Coney Barrett to Ginsburg’s seat, could view the long-running controversy over race-conscious admissions in a new light.... [read post]
13 Nov 2020, 4:32 am by Stephen Sachs
As Justice Barrett noted, you can't sue Congress to make them repeal a law; and in any case, courts don't issue "writs of erasure," stripping pages out of the Statutes at Large. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 6:00 pm by Howard Bashman
“COVID-19 Restrictions Are Suddenly in Peril at the Supreme Court; Amy Coney Barrett now has an opportunity to cast the fifth vote freeing churches from public health restrictions”: Mark Joseph Stern has this jurisprudence essay online at Slate. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 3:46 pm by Amy Howe
She was succeeded by the more conservative Barrett, who is more likely to be receptive to the church’s argument than her predecessor. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 6:50 am by James Romoser
Here’s a round-up of Supreme Court-related news and commentary from around the web: Supreme Court Lies Low as Trump Keeps Pressing Election Claims (Greg Stohr, Bloomberg) The Supreme Court’s Pennsylvania Cleanup (Editorial Board, The Wall Street Journal) Key Justices Signal Support for Affordable Care Act (Adam Liptak, The New York Times) Supreme Court Justices Question GOP States’ Case Against ACA (Jess Bravin, The Wall Street Journal) Supreme Court Appears Likely To Uphold… [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 5:20 am by Marty Lederman
”)Even so, Wall continued, the 2017 Congress inadvertently did the very opposite of what it intended, and the Court has no choice but to read the 2017 amendment to have that unintended effect--indeed, the antithetical, converse effect--even though it would mean that the 2017 Congress acted in a way that it, and everyone else, understood it lacked the constitutional power to do:But I don't think it's fair, Justice Barrett, to say that the Court shouldn't apply the… [read post]
11 Nov 2020, 12:56 pm by Tom Smith
Yesterday’s oral argument before the Supreme Court was most notable in the collapsing of the false narrative used by many Democratic senators and media figures in the Barrett confirmation that the Affordable Care Act was close to being overturned in the case of California v. [read post]
11 Nov 2020, 11:03 am by Howard Bashman
“Shock and frustration inside Justice Dept. over Barr’s vote-investigation memo”: Devlin Barrett and Matt Zapotosky have this article in today’s edition of The Washington Post. [read post]
10 Nov 2020, 7:52 pm by Jayesh Rathod
Roberts and Barrett revealed less, but seemed persuaded that the government could sidestep this entire issue by modifying some agency practices. [read post]
10 Nov 2020, 2:54 pm by Amy Howe
The court’s newest justice, Amy Coney Barrett, wondered aloud whether the individual challengers had sued the right defendants. [read post]