Search for: "Borders v. Borders" Results 3001 - 3020 of 6,659
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Feb 2015, 2:55 am
 Never too late 30 [week ending Sunday 25 January] -- Julia Reda’s EU copyright revolution | GC on trade-marketing bottle shapes in (T-69/14 and T-70/14) | IPKat and BLACA’s event on Sensory copyright | IP Cross-Border Enforcement | US Supreme Court in Teva v Sandoz | On-line copyright infringement in Spain | GC on the ‘Pianissimo’ trade mark for vacuum cleaners in Case T‑11/14 Grundig Multimedia… [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 3:06 am by Adam Wagner
G v E & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 939 – Read judgment – 1COR’s Guy Mansfield QC appeared for the Respondent. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 4:57 pm by NL
This does not, however, include a Jack Russell/Border Collie cross. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 9:25 am by Charles Roth
Mesa, in which a border patrol agent fired across the border into Mexico, killing a young, unarmed Mexican boy. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 8:36 am
  A select few students in border districts go to schools across state lines. [read post]
11 May 2016, 4:00 am by Administrator
Corruption often transcends borders. [read post]
24 Dec 2023, 6:34 am by Just Security
Policymakers’ Lessons from Yemen for Gaza by Wa’el Alzayat (@WaelAlzayat) and Jeremy Konyndyk (@JeremyKonyndyk) Artificial Intelligence EU’s AI Act Falls Short on Protecting Rights at Borders by Petra Molnar (@_PMolnar) National Security Carve-Outs Undermine AI Regulations by Faiza Patel (@FaizaPatelBCJ) and Patrick C. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 3:53 am
Last year in District of Columbia v. [read post]
7 Nov 2021, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
The Cyberspace Administration of China (“CAC”) has released for public comment “Draft Measures on Security Assessment of Cross-border Data Transfer” (“Draft Measures”). [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 9:12 am by Lorelie S. Masters and Paul T. Moura
  For example, the New York Insurance Law specifically provides that evidence relating to other “similarly situated” policyholders is relevant to the issue of the materiality of an alleged misrepresentation in the policy application.5 As exemplified by the New York Court of Appeals in Belt Painting v. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 3:35 am by Russ Bensing
  As for his claim that the trial court’s sentence — four years, out of a possible five — was excessive, the court finds this argument “borders on the ludicrous. [read post]