Search for: "California v. Law"
Results 3001 - 3020
of 34,277
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jun 2009, 8:53 pm
The case cite is Beijing Tong Ren Tang (USA) Corp. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm
Suppose the California Supreme Court (the ultimate interpreter of State law) were to rule that search and seizure protections under the California Constitution do not extend to automobiles. [read post]
17 Apr 2009, 3:04 pm
The California Supreme Court has asked the parties in Roby v. [read post]
20 Apr 2014, 2:55 pm
California, decided by the U.S. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 11:37 am
California is here. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 7:24 am
California is here. [read post]
23 Apr 2008, 10:53 am
I was aware of CashCall, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 4:00 am
Supreme Court suggested that a "de minimis" defense to FLSA wage claims might exist under federal law, but 70 years later, the California Supreme Court found the reasoning behind those comments outdated. [read post]
12 Feb 2022, 5:42 am
” California Law Lawyers argue for a living. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 1:14 pm
July 12, 2013) (post) and Brazil v. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 12:05 pm
Something appropriate for the California bar exam, or maybe a class on California criminal law:"Defendant hates his next-door neighbor. [read post]
30 Aug 2024, 9:31 am
That is why the California Supreme Court must take up and reverse the appellate opinion in the case of Snap v. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 11:35 am
” The Court of Appeal reasoned that because the California Supreme Court in Discover Bank v. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 11:35 am
” The Court of Appeal reasoned that because the California Supreme Court in Discover Bank v. [read post]
6 Nov 2007, 5:02 am
’” Shersher v. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 3:01 pm
For nearly all that time, the firm also has written Miller & Starr, California Real Estate 4th, a 12-volume treatise on California real estate law. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 5:19 am
California, Inc. (2009) 172 Cal.App.4th 908, 921-922; Budrow v. [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 12:25 pm
Thomas Wuil Joo (University of California - Davis Law School) has posted Yick Wo Re-Revisited: Nonblack Nonwhites and Fourteenth Amendment History (University of Illinois Law Review, Fall 2008) on SSRN. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 1:08 pm
In Wons v. [read post]
1 May 2018, 1:02 pm
However, the California Supreme Court has now definitively adopted a new test for determining whether a worker is an employee or an independent contractor under the California Wage Orders in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
