Search for: "Companies A, B, and C"
Results 3001 - 3020
of 12,895
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Mar 2020, 9:00 am
(Art. 32(2)(b).) [read post]
18 Mar 2020, 3:58 am
A court would be required to examine: a) the facts of the outbreak in China and its impact on the Chinese factory, b) the contractual relationship between the Chinese factory and the importer and c) the contract between the U.S. importer and the customer. [read post]
17 Mar 2020, 2:45 pm
Failure to accommodate people’s reasonable fears could result in liability. c. [read post]
17 Mar 2020, 10:29 am
" (314).So, for instance, sure, one reason society may not see enough private investment in developing life-saving drugs is the fact that drug companies could not recoup the cost of their research and testing if they could not exclude generics from copying their novel findings and undercutting their prices. [read post]
17 Mar 2020, 7:40 am
The transition meant that the previous legacy-laden airline company was left behind, and a new (and leaner) company emerged. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 4:17 pm
William B. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 1:54 pm
In a 6-2 decision authored by Justice Breyer, the Court held that the act of disseminating those emails, while knowing their content to be untrue, subjected petitioner to primary liability under subsections (a) and (c) of Rule 10b-5. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 8:49 am
The statement specifically mentions the following legal bases as relevant in the present context: processing that is “necessary for reasons of public interest in the area of public health” (Article 9(2)(i) GDPR); processing that is “necessary to protect the vital interests of the data subject or of another natural person” (Articles 6(1)(d) and 9(2)(c) GDPR); and processing that is “necessary for compliance with a legal obligation” (Articles… [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 5:08 am
The occupational physician can communicate any infections to the employer and persons who were in contact with the infected person on the basis of Articles 6(1)(c) and 9(2)(b) GDPR. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 4:34 am
MRSA, Norovirus, E. coli, H1N1, Salmonella enterica, Staphylococcus aureus, Legionella pneumophilia, Hepatitis B&C, Aspergillus niger and so on. [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 8:59 pm
Ledesma-Cadhit et al, the plaintiffs invoked the PHACA as a basis for suing a physician and pharmaceutical company in negligence, after their 5 year old daughter died, allegedly as a result of the administration of the H1N1 influenza vaccination during a pandemic health risk in 2009. [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 2:03 pm
C is for (secure) Connection: Check that employees have access to a secure network connection. [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 7:13 am
Employers have specific obligations under the Spanish labor law to ensure the safety and health of their employees and avoid the spreading of the disease within their company and/or work centers (on the basis of Articles 6(1)(c) and 9(2)(b) GDPR). [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 1:10 pm
Section 316.193(3)(c)(2). [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 8:07 am
In its appeal, Nevsun argued that the plaintiffs’ claims should be struck without consideration of the merits, on the basis that (a) the act of state doctrine applied, such that Canadian courts lacked subject-matter jurisdiction over any of the plaintiffs’ claims, and (b) there existed no separate cause of action in Canadian tort law for breaches of customary international law. [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 3:45 am
At a broad level, this shows that subsidiaries of UK companies located in the U.S. face a similar tax rate as domestic U.S. companies; however, it is more expensive from a tax perspective for a UK company to invest in the U.S. relative to investing at home. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 7:50 am
Furthermore, the DPC took the view that in emergency situations, where no other legal basis can be identified, companies may be in a position to rely on Article 9(2)(c) GDPR to process personal data to protect the vital interests of an individual data subject or other persons. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 5:47 pm
The EARN IT Act would set up a 19-member commission (Section 3(c)) to develop best practices that companies would have to adopt to get immunity. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 10:20 am
Among other sources of confusion, Section 4(b)(2) articulates the criteria that “the Attorney General” should consider in approving/denying–but why are these criteria only directed to the AG if the DHS/FTC representatives also must “agree”? [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 2:48 pm
Should the Corporation be a C Corporation or an S Corporation for income tax purposes? [read post]
