Search for: "Cost v. Cost"
Results 3001 - 3020
of 48,948
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Mar 2023, 2:19 pm
Anthony List v. [read post]
28 Mar 2023, 6:01 am
This, in turn, could unleash tax sheltering that might cost the federal government billions of dollars in revenue, most or all of it from the upper income brackets. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 9:46 pm
It is against all this context that a very recent decision of the Federal Court of Australia – ACCC v Booktopia Pty Ltd [2023] FCA 194 – is of quite some interest. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 1:04 pm
—Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. 1Total Car Restoration v. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 9:00 am
In the now final rule, EPA has revoked an earlier action taken in 2020, in which the agency declined to regulate HAP emissions from EGUs after comparing the costs of compliance relative to the benefits of regulation, relying at the time on the Supreme Court’s decision in Michigan v. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 5:26 am
Coinbase, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 3:00 am
In Loving v. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 1:25 am
On the same day, O’Callaghan J made an order for costs in the case of Watkins v Tatana [2023] FCA 248, in favour of the Respondents. [read post]
26 Mar 2023, 9:05 pm
For example, the Fifth Circuit in Stokes v. [read post]
26 Mar 2023, 6:14 pm
See Gallegos v. [read post]
26 Mar 2023, 5:00 pm
Coinbase, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Mar 2023, 8:53 am
Instead he ordered that the Respondent should pay the costs of the appeal, in any event. [read post]
25 Mar 2023, 6:14 am
Here are a few: Focus on Cost Reduction: Some critics argue that the primary focus of leakage management is cost reduction rather than ensuring that legitimate claims are paid. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 10:00 pm
Edmead, J.), entered August 26, 2021, denying the petition to compel respondent to disclose "all current NYPD rosters of officers (of all ranks) in all precincts" pursuant to the Freedom of Information Law (FOIL), granting respondent's cross motion to dismiss the petition, and dismissing this proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78, unanimously affirmed, without costs. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 10:00 pm
Edmead, J.), entered August 26, 2021, denying the petition to compel respondent to disclose "all current NYPD rosters of officers (of all ranks) in all precincts" pursuant to the Freedom of Information Law (FOIL), granting respondent's cross motion to dismiss the petition, and dismissing this proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78, unanimously affirmed, without costs. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 3:00 pm
Robert Loeb provided a synopsis of Bahlul v. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 10:45 am
Cohen v. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 10:15 am
Co. v. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 7:25 am
Jackson Women's Health Organization, overturning Roe v. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 6:00 am
The court then explained that an "appointment of an individual from a constitutionally valid expired list violates Article V, §6 of the NY Constitution" citing Matter of City of New York v New York State Div. of Human Rights, 93 NY2d 768.* Nevertheless, in light of the conditional offer of employment given to Plaintiff, and his request for back pay, the Appellate Division denied the Respondents' request that the Appellate Division dismiss Plaintiff's appeal… [read post]
