Search for: "Daily v. Daily" Results 3001 - 3020 of 17,081
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Feb 2009, 2:33 am
R (Binyam Mohamed) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs (4) [2009] EWHC 152 (Admin); [2009] WLR (D) 36 “A novel issue, the striking of a balance between the public interest in national security and the public interest in open justice, the rule of law and democratic accountability, lay at the heart of the [...] [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 2:01 am
Chief Constable of Humberside Police and others v Information Commissioner (Secretary of State for the Home Department intervening) [2009] EWCA Civ 1079; [2009] WLR (D) 302 “In relation to the national police computer it was for the data controller to determine the purposes for which data was processed. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 2:38 am
TRM Copy Centres (UK) Ltd and others v Lanwall Services Ltd [2009] UKHL35; [2009] WLR (D) 190 “An agreement between the provider of photocopiers and the retailer in whose premises the photocopiers were located was not a consumer hire agreement within the meaning of s 15 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 if there was no [...] [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 10:31 am
R (Barclay and others) v Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice and others [2008] EWCA Civ 1319; [2008] WLR (D) 376 “The Reform (Sark) Law 2008, which, inter alia, provided, in relation to the Island of Sark, a Crown Dependency and a part of the Bailiwick of Guernsey, for the Seneschal, the senior judge [...] [read post]
20 May 2009, 3:19 am
R (Smith) v Oxfordshire Assistant Deputy Coroner (Equality and Human Rights Commission intervening) [2009] EWCA Civ 441 “A British soldier on military service in Iraq was subject to the jurisdiction of the United Kingdom within the meaning of art 1 of the Human Rights Convention and as such benefited from the rights guaranteed by the Human [...] [read post]
26 Mar 2009, 3:28 am
R (Binyam Mohamed) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs (No 5) [2009] EWHC 571 (Admin); [2009] WLR (D) 110 “Consistent with the interests of open justice and the rule of law, an annex to an earlier judgment of the court, integral to that judgment but previously withheld so as not to prejudice confidential [...] [read post]
24 Jan 2010, 3:55 am
"activist ejected from 'public' meeting on secret copyright treaty for tweeting" http://j.mp/4Qd2znreading "facebook user agreement upheld in copyright infringement lawsuit over third party app - miller v. facebook" http://j.mp/4LOa1h@jacobwe on "how obama's cool, detached temperament is hurting him and his party" http://j.mp/6iu4Yb@nickdowse would you like some lady gaga cookies? [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 4:13 am
i'm not sure it is ... http://j.mp/djYfde@kyles_p has posted an excellent summary of telstra corporation limited v phone directories company pty ltd http://j.mp/9zFm0c@suziblack what do you think this means? [read post]
13 May 2011, 3:25 am by tracey
” WLR Daily, 11th may 2011 Source: www.iclr.co.uk Please note that once a case has been fully reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 2:52 am by tracey
Regina (NM) v Islington Borough Council: [2012] EWHC 414 (Admin);  [2012] WLR (D)  52 “When considering whether a duty of assessment of needs for community care services had arisen under section 47(1) of the National Health Service and Community Care Act 1990 the interpretation of the words ‘may be in need of any such services’ covered both cases of present need and a narrow penumbra of cases of reasonably predictable future need.” WLR… [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 2:49 am by tracey
If the highway authority exercised that power the frontager would become entitled to compensation under section 66(8) of the 1980 Act.” WLR Daily, 7th December 2011 Source: www.iclr.co.uk [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 2:25 am by sally
Berry v Star Autos Ltd and others [2011] EWCA Civ 1304; [2011] WLR (D) 327 “On a claim to which there were two or more defendants the court had power to order an interim payment under CPR r 25.7(1)(e) if it were satisfied that at least one of the defendants against whom the application for interim payment was being made would be held liable and each of those defendants was insured; the fact that there might be another defendant who was not insured was immaterial.” WLR… [read post]
20 Jan 2017, 10:05 am by Ruthann Robson
Professor Ruthann Robson, City University of New York (CUNY) School of Law A few days before he was sworn in as President of the United States, the complaint in Zervos v. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 11:32 am by constitutional lawblogger
This question, or at least some version of it, is at the heart of the Supreme Court's consideration of United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 5:26 am by constitutional lawblogger
As the Court - - - and the country - - - consider the Voting Rights Act (VRA) and the constitutionality of the preclearance provision at issue in Shelby County v. [read post]