Search for: "Defendants A-F"
Results 3001 - 3020
of 29,817
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Apr 2009, 7:00 am
By Stephanie F. [read post]
6 Oct 2008, 8:19 am
., 538 F.3d 217 (3d Cir. 2008) Hunt's putative class action alleged that the defendant (Smokeless) engaged in anticompetitive behavior, artificially inflating the price of its smokeless tobacco by at least 7 cents a can more than an efficient market would have charged. [read post]
30 Mar 2007, 12:06 am
Salinas, --- F.3d ----, 2007 WL 646132 (5th Cir. [read post]
19 Jun 2010, 7:00 am
In About Electronic Evidence, computers expert witness Ernesto F. [read post]
21 May 2009, 12:45 pm
By Stephanie F. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 4:00 am
By Stephanie F. [read post]
18 Jun 2011, 6:27 am
Wright, 16 F.3d 1429, 1437 (6th Cir. 1994) (“[T]he appropriate inquiry for a federal court considering a motion to suppress evidence seized by state police officers is whether the arrest, search, or seizure violated the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
27 Aug 2013, 5:51 am
State Room Inc., 665 F.3d 235, 240 (1st Cir.2011). [read post]
4 Apr 2015, 3:42 pm
Skoien, 614 F.3d at 639-45; United States v. [read post]
24 Nov 2009, 2:09 am
Pena, __ F.3d __ (1st Cir. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 5:13 pm
James F. [read post]
14 Aug 2008, 11:00 am
Stevens, 25 F.3d 318 (6th Cir. 1994) and Oliver v. [read post]
12 Apr 2008, 5:04 pm
[In re Rhone-Poulenc Rorer, Inc. 51 F.3d 1293 (7th Cir. 1995)]. [read post]
4 Oct 2007, 6:47 am
" 236 F.3d at 677. [read post]
13 Nov 2007, 4:20 pm
Defendant's stop was based on reasonable suspicion from a reliable snitch, and the defendant consented during the stop of the vehicle. [read post]
25 May 2012, 11:49 am
Co., 55 F.3d 873, 879-80 (3d Cir. 1995). [read post]
3 Apr 2010, 7:20 am
Garcia, 474 F.3d 994, 997 (7th Cir. 2007)). [read post]
14 Aug 2010, 4:10 pm
Ocheltree, 622 F.2d 992, 994 (9th Cir. 1980); United States v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 3:48 am
Antenor, 88 F.3d at 932-37. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 4:45 pm
Penalties for Violations of the Liquor License Act Upon the completion of its investigation, the Deputy Registrar of the ACGO will issue one of the following decisions: a) Taking no further action; b) Issuing a written warning; c) Imposing an Order of Monetary Penalty; d) Issuing a Notice of Proposal to attach conditions to a license; e) Issuing… [read post]