Search for: "Doe 103"
Results 3001 - 3020
of 3,234
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 May 2008, 9:09 am
– Brdo: (IPR-Helpdesk), 5-6 June: USFDA public meeting on evaluation of product trade names: (FDA Law Blog), 5-7 June: European research and innovation exhibition – Paris: (IPR-Helpdesk), 9-12 June: (US) Strategies for management of IP – Chicago: (IPR-Helpdesk), 11 June: US PLI ‘Advanced patent licensing 2008: What you need to know before licensing your patent’ – San Francisco: (Patent Docs), 11 June: MARQUES ‘First meeting with… [read post]
27 May 2008, 6:41 am
§ 103, not to demonstrate a compositional difference to address the anticipation rejection under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
26 May 2008, 12:46 pm
I'd rather see some of these justice system issues resolved than capitalize on them to muscle parties into settlement, but the Courts are what they are and the system does what it does -- slowly, cumbersomely, expensively, distractingly, maddeningly, intrusively and unpredictably.Resolving Contract Disputes with Non-Lawyer MediatorsBecause I'm speaking to the Los Angeles Superior Court's "non-attorney"… [read post]
23 May 2008, 1:03 am
: (Technological Innovation and Intellectual Property), Does Petra Moser show patents encourage successful innovation? [read post]
22 May 2008, 9:20 am
Stevens, 1946 "on the Theory of Scales of Measurement" Science,Vol. 103, No. 2684How do you measure an online reputation? [read post]
16 May 2008, 12:43 pm
`(A) IN GENERAL- Notwithstanding sections 502 through 505, and subject to subparagraph (B), in a civil action brought under this title for infringement of copyright in a work, the remedies for infringement shall be limited in accordance with subsection (c) if the infringer– `(B) EXCEPTION- Subparagraph (A) does not apply if, after receiving notice of the claim for infringement and having an opportunity to conduct an expeditious good faith investigation of the claim, the… [read post]
16 May 2008, 8:03 am
– Brdo: (IPR-Helpdesk), 9-12 June: (US) Strategies for management of IP – Chicago: (IPR-Helpdesk), 16 June / 1 July:US PLI: ‘Prior art & obviousness 2008: The PTO and CAFC perspective on patent law sections 102 & 103’ - San Francisco / New York: (Patent Docs), 17-20 June: US BIO international convention – San Diego: (Patent Docs), 18-20 June / 9-11 July: US PLI: ‘Fundamentals of patent prosecution… [read post]
12 May 2008, 5:17 pm
., 31 AD3d 100, 103-104; Burack v Tower Ins. [read post]
9 May 2008, 10:30 pm
, US: ACI ‘In-house counsel forum on pharmaceutical antitrust’ – 20-21 May, Maryland: (Orange Book Blog), EU: Workshop for mediators in IP disputes – 26-27 May, Geneva: (IPR-Helpdesk), US: PLI: ‘Advanced patent licensing 2008: What you need to know before licensing your patent’ – 28 May, New York / 11 June, San Francisco: (Patent Docs), US: Worldwide Business Research: PharmaBiotech IP summit – 28-30 May,… [read post]
9 May 2008, 11:30 am
That he failed to prevail on that contention does not mean his argument was not fairly considered. [read post]
8 May 2008, 5:00 pm
The Colorado Court of Appeals reversed the trial court, noting that where contract contains a differing site conditions clause, the contractor does not assume the risk of unknown and unforeseen subsurface conditions. [read post]
5 May 2008, 4:52 pm
[viii] When somebody does decide to sue the police for using excessive force, the first problem to overcome is the vague notion of how much police can do to physically restrain a suspect. [read post]
5 May 2008, 2:23 pm
§ 103. [read post]
5 May 2008, 2:34 am
But, your question does not involve the legitimate, or even the close, plaintiffs' cases. [read post]
4 May 2008, 11:08 am
Four courts have rejected this, stating that as the SCA does not refer to real-time data, and the Pen/Trap statute gives no right to information tracking a user's location, the only way to grant the government access to such information is under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 41(d)(1), which requires a showing of probable cause before a search warrant is issued.13The government has also argued that there is no Fourth Amendment implication in the communication between the cell phone… [read post]
2 May 2008, 10:03 pm
The examiner piled on §103(a) combos. [read post]
30 Apr 2008, 3:35 pm
Supreme Court Rule 103(b) allows a court to dismiss the case if the plaintiff does not exercise reasonable diligence to secure the service of summons. [read post]
29 Apr 2008, 7:28 am
The Court does not relish the opportunity to resolve discovery spats that likely could have been resolved by the parties on their own. [read post]
29 Apr 2008, 7:13 am
Crosby, 397 F.3d 103 (2005), the order is affirmed over claims that the district court erroneously refused to consider the terms of a rejected plea offer in which the government had offered to recommend a lower sentence. [read post]
24 Apr 2008, 6:04 am
This is life,' said Senator Donald DeFronzo, 'It achieves more as a political sound bite and a sports metaphor than it does as a piece of solid legislation. [read post]
