Search for: "Doe v. Attorney General" Results 3001 - 3020 of 20,995
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 May 2007, 9:32 pm
In a February 2007 post, a different attorney suggested that the Supreme Court would give guidance to courts and the USPTO to know it [obviousness] when they see it, curiously citing to Justice Stewart's often-ridiculed statement in Jacobellis v. [read post]
11 Mar 2021, 2:29 am by Brian E. Barreira
In drafting irrevocable trusts, much concern has to be given to the attitude of the MassHealth agency against irrevocable trusts, especially where the agency ends up having the weight of the Office of the Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts on its side against any trusts that end up in Massachusetts courts. [read post]
31 Aug 2007, 10:21 am
While courts generally hold that "[a]n attorney's inadvertence, neglect, mistake or misplaced reliance does not constitute good cause for the purposes of the Rule 4(m)," see, e.g., Howard v. [read post]
Before us in the present is a 49-page document docketed as 23-cr-80101 in the Southern District of Florida, conspicuously captioned: United States of America v. [read post]
27 May 2014, 1:19 pm by John C. Manoog III
The Attorney General forwarded the presentment letter to the general counsel of the Executive Office of Health and Human Services, requesting an investigation. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 2:28 pm by Gregory Forman
 In order to support a finding of contempt for violation of a court order, “[t]he language of the commands must be clear and certain rather than implied” Welchel v. [read post]
31 Dec 2017, 10:36 am by Marty Lederman
By Marty Lederman and David LubanThis coming Friday, the Supreme Court Justices are scheduled to consider, at conference, the government’s nominal “petition for certiorari” in No. 17-654, Hargan v. [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 12:03 pm by Raj Chohan
  (See previous CAB posts on  Nov. 4, 2010 and Nov. 9, 2010) So does the future of consumer class actions still seem dire after oral argument? [read post]