Search for: "Does 1 - 33" Results 3001 - 3020 of 6,149
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 May 2016, 12:30 pm
  However, prescription medical products are exempt:This section does not apply to:  . [read post]
5 May 2016, 9:02 am by Ed. Microjuris.com Puerto Rico
The second provision probably means a chapter 9 type restructuring method for the territory, that does not exist and that Congress is set against. [read post]
4 May 2016, 6:44 am by Bill Marler
” [18] The Incidence of Listeria Infections Listeria bacteria are found widely in the environment in soil, including in decaying vegetation and water, and may be part of the fecal flora of a large number of mammals, including healthy human adults. [4, 18] According to the FDA, “studies suggest that 1-10% of humans may be intestinal carriers of Listeria. [read post]
1 May 2016, 7:02 am by Thomas G. Heintzman
Second, does the court have a discretion to not set aside the award even if a breach of the Model Law has occurred? [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 11:29 am by David Fraser
Instead of being included in PIPEDA by s. 4(1)(a), I would suggest that most search engines are excluded due to the operation of s. 4(2)(c) of PIPEDA: Limit (2)         This Part does not apply to ... [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 9:52 pm
Ulster County Savings Inst., 161 NY at 33-34 [1899].Although no prescribed form of a Notice is Claim is mandated under SCPA § 1803, the statute does require that the Notice be written, contain a statement of the facts upon which the claim is based, and the sum claimed and be served personally upon the representative of the estate. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 9:26 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Since the PSLRA does not apply, discovery continues (and can lead to skyrocketing costs for defendants) while the court considers whether or not to dismiss the case. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 6:34 am
Swick, 2012–NMSC–018, ¶ 33, 279 P.3d 747 (New Mexico Supreme Court 2012). [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 2:06 pm by Giles Peaker
Reg 57(1) provides that any “matter which could be the subject of an appeal under section 16 of the Act may not be raised in proceedings under this part (i.e. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 5:01 am
Court of Appeals for the 2d Circuit 2010); however, it does not require an issuing court to `set forth precisely the procedures to be followed by the executing officers. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 4:29 am by Supreme People's Court Monitor
 The author of the article mentioned above mentions that the draft does not deal with indirect structures, designed to prevent the existing shareholder from exercising his rights, as illustrated by the Fosun/Shanghai Soho dispute. [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 5:56 am by Marty Lederman
 8 U.S.C. 1229a; see 8 U.S.C. 1182(a)(6)(A)(i), 1227(a)(1)(B); see also Pet. [read post]