Search for: "Does 1 - 38"
Results 3001 - 3020
of 4,958
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Apr 2013, 10:19 am
Owners of property in San Francisco of 7,500 square feet or less (5,000 square feet or less after June 1, 2013), must also comply with Chapter 38 of the San Francisco Administrative Code. [read post]
18 Apr 2013, 5:16 pm
However, to exclude processes of development which are incapable of leading to a human being does not, in my view, strike a balance at all. [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 1:03 pm
Assorted Weirdness — Chief Justice Roberts Edition The Chief had to go there — he asks counsel for the Birth Father about blood quantum on pages 38-29, lines 25-25, 1-6: If — if you had a tribe, is there at all a threshold before you can call, under the statute, a child an “Indian child”? [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 12:27 am
HISTORY amounted to trade mark infringement of its own word mark THE HISTORY CHANNEL and device mark containing the term HISTORY, both of which were registered as Community trade marks in Classes 9, 16, 38 and 41, the former also registered as a UK trade mark in Classes 38 and 41 broadly relating to cable and television broadcasting services. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 9:44 am
38 J. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 5:40 am
In this issue: (2013) 10:1 SCRIPTed 1-139 Issue DOI: 10.2966/scrip.100113 Cover Post-mortem PrivacyNayha Sethi Editorial Post Mortem Privacy Lilian Edwards, pp.1-6 | HTML | PDF | Dedicated Section on Post Mortem Privacy Access to the Digital Self in Life and Death: Privacy in the Context of Posthumously Persistent Facebook Profiles Elaine Kasket, pp.7-18 | HTML | PDF | Does the EU Data Protection Regime Protect Post-Mortem Privacy and What Could Be The Potential… [read post]
13 Apr 2013, 5:38 am
Customs classification — under which category of the HTSUS does the good fall? [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 12:30 pm
SD. 2007) (quoting Restatement (Second) of Agency § 1 (1958)). [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 11:00 am
So does Peter Finn of the Washington Post. [read post]
11 Apr 2013, 3:33 pm
.), and is banned in 38 states (3 states,New Mexico, New Jersey and Rhode Island, have abstained on the issue). [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 5:01 pm
In this respect reference is also made to decision G 1/03 [4], according to which the introduction during the prosecution of a European patent application of an allowable disclaimer does not change the identity of the invention within the meaning of A 87(1). [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 9:13 am
Steele repeats the same themes as his colleagues, and cites many of the same authorities, but does so more forcefully. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 6:57 am
Call that cluster 1. [read post]
9 Apr 2013, 3:57 pm
(ECF 69-1, pp. 21:18-2, 38:22-39:15, 40:8-12.) [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 4:59 am
Gajadhar, 38 AD3d 127, 135 [2007]. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 1:01 pm
Lexis 44106, at *36-38, borders on bizarre. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 12:10 pm
1/5 americans qualify for free counsel . [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 9:00 am
However, the preamble does not confer any legal right. [read post]
2 Apr 2013, 6:20 am
The facility is not constructed in such a manner that drip or condensate does not contaminate food, food-contact surfaces, or food-packaging materials. [read post]
31 Mar 2013, 5:01 pm
Article 14(1) RRF provides that the reduction laid down in R 6(3) shall be 20% of the filing fee. [4] If amount due as filing fee is not paid in full within one month of filing the European patent application (R 38(1)) then the application is deemed to be withdrawn in application of A 78(2).Pursuant to Article 8 RRF the Office may, where this is considered justified, overlook any small amounts lacking without prejudice to the rights of the person making the payment. [read post]
