Search for: "English v. English"
Results 3001 - 3020
of 9,841
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jul 2013, 5:44 am
Briefly: At this blog, Tom Goldstein provides a “plain English” summary of this past Term’s rulings on same-sex marriage, affirmative action (in Fisher v. [read post]
10 Jan 2016, 7:11 am
She is fluent in Dutch, English, and Russian. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 1:14 pm
CLS Bank v. [read post]
30 Apr 2009, 2:30 am
Cont'l Nut Co. v. [read post]
19 Nov 2019, 3:43 pm
See Tull v. [read post]
18 Feb 2017, 9:06 am
Case citation: Pierce v. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 12:28 pm
Marmazov, Pavlo V. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 3:46 pm
InterDigital v ZTE is case where ZTE is, contrary to their position in the English proceedings, willing to be bound by a licence settled by the US court regardless of validity and infringement being heard later. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 3:46 am
Better English. [read post]
3 Feb 2007, 8:28 am
" Deninno v. [read post]
27 Aug 2007, 5:19 am
Parris v. [read post]
1 Nov 2009, 8:50 am
State v. [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 3:00 am
EP 702 had been held to be valid by the English Patents Court. [read post]
13 May 2015, 4:37 am
Among the English authorities there were a couple of cases that required particular comment. [read post]
The English High Court Considers the Challenge of Arbitration Awards Under s.67 Arbitration Act 1996
24 Nov 2008, 9:11 am
In Michael Wilson & Partners Limited (A company incorporated in the British Virgin Islands) v John Forster Emmott [2008] EWHC 2684 (Comm), the court was asked to consider whether a decision of an arbitral tribunal consisting of an answer to two procedural questions was an award as to its substantive jurisdiction, and as such open to challenge under s.67 Arbitration Act 1996 (the Act).Michael Wilson & Partners (Michael Wilson) provided legal services in Kazakhstan. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 1:51 am
Distinguishing the House of Lords decision in Denny-Mott and Dixon v James Fraser and Co, the judge held that the contract between the Club and IRISL was to provide indemnity insurance and that "[p]art of that purpose remained lawful. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 4:05 pm
Moreover, given the recent approach of the Canadian Court of Appeal in Paulsson v. [read post]
8 Jul 2022, 7:13 am
Earlier this week, a panel of the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals decided Arizona v. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 5:12 pm
The case of OPQ v BJM ([2011] EWHC 1059 (QB)) addresses one of the most difficult practical issues in privacy law and adopts a novel solution. [read post]
12 Nov 2007, 4:37 am
EEOC v. [read post]
