Search for: "Fast v. Fast"
Results 3001 - 3020
of 6,850
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Oct 2015, 7:57 am
In Dominguez v. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 7:14 am
Jones, J.S.C. shed some much-needed light on an essential question; namely: can the court retroactively set an obligor’s child support obligation to a date earlier than the filing date of an actual motion to establish child support in the reported case of Kakstys v. [read post]
20 Oct 2015, 7:32 am
A couple weeks ago, I blogged about Lenz v. [read post]
20 Oct 2015, 7:30 am
State v. [read post]
14 Oct 2015, 9:50 am
So, even if Jim could have spotted the truck at the last second, it was going WAY too fast for him to have done anything about it. [read post]
14 Oct 2015, 4:45 am
SCOTUSBlog has coverage of the interesting oral argument:The case is about a brutal murder in a fast-food restaurant in Pensacola, but it reaches the Court as a clear-cut test of what the Justices had in mind in the 2002 decision in Ring v. [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 4:27 pm
The case is about a brutal murder in a fast-food restaurant in Pensacola, but it reaches the Court as a clear-cut test of what the Justices had in mind in the 2002 decision in Ring v. [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 9:10 am
Attractive: It’s fast—18 months—and it’s specialized. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 12:23 pm
Even though it was the driver who actually agreed to drive so fast. [read post]
11 Oct 2015, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court finally ruled that many restrictions on lawyer advertising violated free speech, in Bates v. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 9:09 pm
(Hurst v. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 3:16 pm
The question then becomes whether a reasonable person in the employee’s position would have accepted the employer’s offer of re-employment.[1] In Fredrickson v. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 9:36 am
Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in Home Care Association of America, et al. v. [read post]
4 Oct 2015, 8:46 am
LEXIS 129824 (D MD, Sept. 28, 2015), a Maryland federal district court held that a Muslim inmate's rights may have been infringed when the former warden failed to follow a Department of Corrections policy that assured Muslim inmates fasting during Ramadan received the same caloric intake as non-fasting prisoners.In Ramadan v. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 1:04 pm
Carr and Montgomery v. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 11:30 am
We have not posted for a while—that day job can really get in the way sometimes—so we agreed to tackle the ridiculously long decision in Christiansen v. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 9:16 am
They show the truth of the old adage that bad facts make bad law.The first is United States v. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 9:11 am
Fast-forward two years. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 2:43 am
In Colón-Lorenzana v. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 6:43 am
Yesterday, the Delaware Supreme Court posted video of that day’s oral argument for the appeal of RBC v. [read post]
