Search for: "Germany v. Germany"
Results 3001 - 3020
of 4,535
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Nov 2023, 8:12 am
Germany onwards to read in safeguards such as independent oversight of surveillance as essential components of legality of surveillance systems. [read post]
30 Jan 2018, 2:12 am
In Canada, the Supreme Court ruledin Equustek v. [read post]
12 Jul 2020, 8:27 am
This, in a nutshell, is the question which the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) had been required to answer in Constantin Film v YouTube, C-264/19.The referral, which Germany’s Federal Court of Justice had made, focused on the interpretation of Article 8(2)(a) of the Enforcement Directive, a piece of EU legislation adopted in 2004.The background national proceedings had originated from the refusal, by YouTube and its parent company Google, to provide film… [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 4:26 am
Trospium chloride, made by Madaus, was sold as "Céris" in France, as "uriVesc" in Germany and as “Regurin” in the United Kingdom -- where Madaus owned the United Kingdom trade mark REGURIN for pharmaceutical preparations etc in Class 5. [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 2:00 pm
," Nordic Journal of International Law, vol. 86, no. 4 (2017)Law Reviews"Interpreting Injustice: The Department of Homeland Security’s Failure to Comply with Federal Language Access Requirements in Immigration Detention," Harvard Latinx Law Review, vol. 20 (Spring 2017)"Jennings v. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 9:51 am
Now, the latest from Nokia v. [read post]
4 Jul 2016, 12:15 am
C-567/14 | Life as an IP Lawyer: Dusseldorf, Germany | ISP's delay in removing content can remove safe harbour | Avengers: when is confusion not confusion? [read post]
8 Jan 2014, 9:08 pm
The trial court erroneously sided with Google in 2012, but it's pretty clear now that the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit will reverse and remand.In Apple v. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 1:07 pm
In Fire and Police Pension Association of Colorado v. [read post]
27 Aug 2019, 1:30 am
Following an Advocate General's opinion in January this year, the CJEU were now tasked with clarifying this issue, and handed down their decision not too long ago.As a very brief primer, the case of Funke Medien NRW GmbH v Bundesrepublik Deutschland concerned the publication of confidential military reports by Funken online by the daily newspaper Westdeutsche Allgemeine Zeitung (having obtained them through unknown means). [read post]
1 Mar 2022, 10:00 pm
President Biden strongly affirmed Article V and the commitment to the defense of every NATO member. [read post]
21 Apr 2014, 8:49 pm
At first sight it appeared to be a settlement, which surprised me because I had attended a Microsoft v. [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 9:53 am
One influential decision, Malewicz v. [read post]
25 Dec 2019, 10:40 am
The Supreme Court's acceptance of Oracle v. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 1:17 am
Robart, clearly a thought leader and pioneer among U.S. federal judges with respect to FRAND, in the Microsoft v. [read post]
1 Jun 2022, 12:37 am
" The claimed invention was made by a reputable and sizeable Dutch research organization named TNO (Nederlandse Organisatie voor Toegepast Natuurwetenschappelijk Onderzoe; Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research).I stumbled upon that announcement as I was checking on the licensing firm's website for potential new information on K.Mizra v. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 10:36 am
In recent years that would be a case widely known in the UK as “Abela – v- Hammonds Suddards et al” where I was the coordinator and head of the legal strategy on behalf of my client, A. [read post]
5 Oct 2012, 7:07 am
V. [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 10:41 pm
But the Federal Court of Justice has meanwhile issued its Sisvel v. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 11:45 am
Lord Justice Arnold (as he now is) has handed down his customarily chunky judgment in the latest stage of "Purple Inhaler Wars" [ideas for a better name on a postcard, please] in Glaxo Wellcome UK Limited and Anor v Sandoz Limited and Ors [2019] EWHC 2545.This GuestKat finds the final result [spoiler alert: paragraph 316] - "all of Glaxo's claims are dismissed" - unsurprising. [read post]
