Search for: "Grant v. People"
Results 3001 - 3020
of 16,997
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jan 2020, 12:32 pm
It's an AEDPA case, so the federal court grants a degree of deference to the state court's conclusions in this regard. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 10:06 am
The US Supreme Court ruled Friday in 303 Creative LLC v. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 11:18 am
” Like Martinez, the jury in People v. [read post]
2 Apr 2007, 10:57 pm
Unfortunately, though, the relief granted by the narrow 5-4 majority was anything but blockbuster. [read post]
16 Aug 2017, 1:01 pm
Mining for compromise in pastoral Greenland: Promise, progress, and problems in international law’s response to indigenous people. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 12:53 am
Founder v. [read post]
19 May 2016, 3:22 am
” On this basis, and for various other reasons, the Court of Appeal concluded that the Claimant was not “likely” to obtain a final injunction at trial in accordance with the test set out in section 12 of the Human Rights Act 1998 (“HRA”) and the judgment of Lord Nicholls in Cream Holdings v Banerjee ([2005] 1 AC 253), and therefore lifted the injunction that it had previously granted. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 5:53 am
The court granted rehearing en banc, but later vacated the order as improvidently granted over the dissents of five judges. [read post]
10 Oct 2012, 4:15 pm
In Shafer v. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 2:05 pm
Arizona, Justice Gorsuch dissents from the denial of certiorari (which was not joined by Justice Kavanaugh, though he did indicate he would grant the petition). [read post]
8 Jun 2022, 1:54 pm
Parker (Tribal Exhaustion) State Courts Bulletin https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2022.html People in Interest of M.M. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 4:09 am
“That Nothing from Nothing Leaves Nothing”: This refers to People ex rel. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 1:30 pm
We review a district court's grant of a permanent injunction for an abuse of discretion. . . examining its factual findings for clear error and its legal determinations de novo. . . [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 4:20 am
It was also held that there was not sufficient evidence to demonstrate that the council had taken the steps (required by section 507B(9)) to ascertain the views of qualifying young people. [read post]
28 Oct 2012, 8:19 pm
If disclosure of the information may be restricted to just a few people, who will first sign confidentiality agreements, and otherwise it will be protected by strict security measures, trade secret protection may work. [read post]
30 Mar 2018, 11:46 am
On March 15 the ECtHR, sitting as the Grand Chamber,decided on the Naït-Litman v. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 5:12 am
Back in 2006, in Monson v. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 8:48 am
The Supreme Court granted cert on April 3, 2017. [read post]
23 Sep 2017, 10:54 am
Case citation: Feminist Majority Foundation v. [read post]
19 Jan 2008, 11:58 am
For the reasons set forth below, we VACATE the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of the defendants on Harris's § 1983 and Brady claims, REVERSE the grant of summary judgment as to Harris's First Amendment retaliation, defamation, and tortious interference claims, AFFIRM the grant of summary judgment as to all of Harris's other claims, and REMAND this case to the district court for further proceedings. 08a0023p.06 … [read post]