Search for: "Grant v. Superior Court"
Results 3001 - 3020
of 6,581
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jan 2015, 7:01 pm
(Op. by Strassburger), the Pennsylvania Superior Court addressed the application of the discovery rule in the context of a limited tort case. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 10:59 am
Petition for review granted. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 6:00 am
In his recent September 30, 2014 decision in the case of Rochow v. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 9:20 am
The Federal Court granted the motion, ruling that the application constituted an abuse of process and that family law disputes are better dealt with in the superior courts. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 6:49 am
“To hold otherwise would allow an employer to wield its superior bargaining power to pressure or even compel its employees to underreport their hours, thus neutering the FLSA’s purposeful reallocation of that power,” the court stated in reversing a lower court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of TitleMax (Bailey v. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 11:10 am
”The court has suspended its ruling for 12 months, giving parliamentarians time to bring the applicable provisions in line with the Charter.In June 2010, the federal government introduced draft legislation in response to the original ruling at the superior court level, which sided with RCMP members. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 6:11 am
Superior Court, supra. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 4:00 am
Superior Court (People), 229 Cal.App.4th 1291 (2014), review granted. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 9:57 am
§ 1 et seq., as held by this Court in AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 6:34 am
Noting that the Supreme Court, in Lane v. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 3:00 am
Deaver v. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 4:04 pm
In Miller v. [read post]
9 Jan 2015, 12:32 pm
The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeal in Portillo v. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 9:05 am
ABM Security Services, Inc., the appellate panel overturned a troubling decision by the LA County Superior Court. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 8:05 am
The Court framed the issues to be reviewed as follows: "(1) Whether the Superior Court improperly interpreted § 1797 of the MVFRL,the Supreme Court case of Herd Chiropractic v. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 6:00 am
Law Society of British Columbia and Black v. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 1:27 pm
Despite the absence of any evidence that anyone’s rest period had actually been interrupted, the superior court granted the motion and awarded plaintiffs $89.7 million. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 6:56 am
This was another reason to grant summary judgment on the employee’s Title VII hostile work environment claim, concluded the court. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 3:22 pm
Center for Biological Diversity v. [read post]
