Search for: "HARMS v. HARMS"
Results 3001 - 3020
of 36,750
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Apr 2023, 3:00 pm
Ally Shahabuddeen on Friday, in Travis v. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 6:43 am
It is clear after Matal v. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 6:26 am
Gandhi v. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 6:00 am
Yamashita v. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 5:45 am
Nor is the harm limited to them. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 5:01 am
Gertz v. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 4:48 am
DeFranco v Napoli Bern Ripka Shkolnik LLP 2023 NY Slip Op 30952(U) March 28, 2023Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 150188/2018 Judge: James E. d’Auguste describes what happens when cases are shuttled between the initial attorneys and “trial counsel”, which in this particular situation means a law firm that took all of the initial attorneys’ cases and worked them up for trial. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 2:20 am
Hachette v. [read post]
2 Apr 2023, 11:52 pm
This is a follow-up to the following three posts: European Commission departs from best practices in hasty preparation of standard-essential patent policy proposal that is fundamentally flawed and unbalancedTable of contents and synopsis of European Commission's draft proposal for standard-essential patent regulation (I've already found some typos--as expected--and may upload a corrected version at some point)Proposed EU SEP regulation will also harm net licensees: implementers of… [read post]
2 Apr 2023, 9:05 pm
Google and Twitter v. [read post]
2 Apr 2023, 1:02 am
The European Commission's leaked draft regulation on standard-essential patents (SEPs) (initial reaction, table of contents and synopsis) is one-sided (as its thrust is an attempt to devalue SEPs), but if it got enacted in this form, it would nonetheless represent a double-edged sword. [read post]
1 Apr 2023, 8:05 am
Although App Star’s applications were subsequently taken down by Google Play and App Star did suffer some harm, there is no evidence to satisfy the knowingly requirement. [read post]
1 Apr 2023, 6:35 am
I have found that a good meme can do as much to make, say, Marbury v. [read post]
31 Mar 2023, 4:26 pm
From Judge Pedro Delgado-Hernández's opinion today in Rodriguez-Cotto v. [read post]
31 Mar 2023, 4:25 pm
For instance, in Schenck v. [read post]
31 Mar 2023, 1:45 pm
The harm the statute was intended to protect against was getting false information because of race; that harm did not depend on how the information was or was not going to be used. [read post]
31 Mar 2023, 1:43 pm
Ohio v. [read post]
31 Mar 2023, 1:19 pm
The case, formally known as Farias v. [read post]
31 Mar 2023, 12:30 pm
Then in City of Austin v. [read post]
31 Mar 2023, 5:01 am
Gonzalez v. [read post]
