Search for: "HARRIS v. STATE" Results 3001 - 3020 of 5,164
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Oct 2013, 7:46 am by Lyle Denniston
Here, in summary, are the other two granted cases: * Harris v. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 3:00 am by Steve Lombardi
  The State filed a motion to dismiss, asserting the  ITCA has no extraterritorial applicability. [read post]
27 Sep 2008, 1:41 pm
Sep. 26, 2008)(per curiam) (condemnation appeal, State prevails)THE STATE OF TEXAS v. [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 1:13 pm
When that day comes, copious reference will no doubt be made to the Class 99 weblog, which has chronicled and commented on numerous "informed user" decisions -- the most recent of which, in Louver-Lite v Harris Parts, you can read here. [read post]
21 Sep 2018, 1:31 pm by Lovechilde
Wade and other disastrous court decisions that Kavanaugh's confirmation ensures, will continue to resonate in 2020 when Elizabeth Warren, Kamala Harris, Kirsten Gillibrand and others will have potent arguments for why women need to lead this country in the White House as well as in state and federal legislatures. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 10:52 am by Steve Vladeck
However the Supreme Court decides the travel ban case in the next 10 days, it may well avoid taking a position on one of the numerous issues raised in that litigation — whether the district court in Trump v. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 9:00 am by Maureen Johnston
Harris 13-1313Issue: Whether the Commerce Clause allows California to impose a complete ban on the sale of wholesome, USDA-approved poultry products from other States and countries - in this case, foie gras - based solely on the agricultural methods used by out-of-state farmers who raise their animals entirely beyond California's borders. [read post]
13 Nov 2024, 4:29 am by Michael C. Dorf
Or perhaps Republicans would simply nominate Trump for president and expect--with some justification given the Supreme Court's ruling in Trump v. [read post]
30 Sep 2024, 5:59 pm by Steven Calabresi
We should not be imposing one-size fits all national rules on abortion, which is one of the many reasons why Dobbs v. [read post]