Search for: "Haling" Results 3001 - 3020 of 3,312
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Mar 2012, 10:28 am by Hugh Tomlinson QC
Lord Phillips considered the various formulations of the test of “public interest” in Reynolds [2001] 2 AC 127 and Jameel [2007] 1 AC 359, agreeing with Lady Hale’s formulation in the latter case that “There must be some real public interest in having this information in the public domain. [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 2:00 pm
" Among the many defense lawyers on the case were Louis Cohen of Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr; Max Shulman of Cravath, Swaine & Moore; Steven Schoenfeld of Torys; Andrew Frackman of [O'Melveny & Myers]; Michael Luskin of Luskin, Stern & Eisler; Robert Ward of Mayer Brown; Mitchell Lowenthal of Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton; Gregory Markel of Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft; and Joseph Freidman of Thorp Reed &… [read post]
8 Mar 2020, 5:10 pm by INFORRM
Judgments The following reserved judgments after public hearings in media law cases are outstanding: ZXC v Bloomberg, heard 3 and 4 March 2020 (Underhill, Bean and Simon LJJ) Hayden v Associated Newspapers, heard 3 March 2020 (Julian Knowles  J) Sube v News Group Newspapers, heard 4 to 7 February 2020 (Warby J) Various Claimants v MGN, heard, 28 to 31 January 2020 (Mann J) W M Morrison Supermarkets plc v Various Claimants, heard 6 and 7 November 2019 (Lady Hale… [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 3:23 pm by Gene Quinn
DuMont, a partner with Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr, is an appellate attorney who has handled a wide variety of cases. [read post]
1 Sep 2014, 12:49 am by Giles Peaker
This distinction between provision (the positive obligation) and interference (the negative obligation in a ‘shared care’ case) is indicated in paragraph 41 of the opinion of Baroness Hale in Holmes-Moorhouse, although I do note that that particular case had nothing to do with Convention rights The consequences were not of such gravity as to amount to ‘sufficient gravity’ under the test in Razgar [2004] 2 AC 368. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 7:29 am by Kyle Persaud
Woodson, the Supreme Court held that to have minimum contacts, “the defendant's conduct and connection with the forum State are such that he should reasonably anticipate being haled into court there. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 10:12 am by Rory Little
” Recognizing that there are exceptions for constitutional claims that the trial court “lacked subject-matter jurisdiction” or that the defendant had a “right not to be haled into court at all,” the court said, without further explanation, that “neither … exception applies here. [read post]
29 Jul 2008, 10:42 pm
That, however, is in my judgment incorrect, as seems plain on the wording and history of the statutes themselves, but has in any event been confirmed by Baroness Hale in Hammersmith and Fulham. [read post]
16 Nov 2019, 8:30 am by Eugene Volokh
" … Vermont courts (and therefore the federal court in Vermont) would normally have "specific personal jurisdiction," because the alleged tort took place in Vermont (despite defendant's argument that, "Defendant's de minimis alleged contacts with Vermont—a weekend in the Green Mountain State over 35 years ago—are insufficient for him to reasonably anticipate being haled into Court in Vermont"); but the defendant argues that this… [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 6:45 am by Dave
 But there we go – that is the “Carrollian” effect of the rule to which both Lord Neuberger and Baroness Hale referred. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 3:12 am by Dave
As Baroness Hale said in Stack (at [69]), in law "context is everything". [read post]
8 Jul 2021, 12:59 pm by Giles Peaker
Third, the injunction order made by DJ Hale was served by Ms Denton on 15 May in compliance with the terms of the order. [read post]
24 Aug 2018, 9:14 am by ASAD KHAN
The Supreme Court Lady Hale and Lords Mance, Kerr, Wilson, Sumption, Reed and Carnwath gave an interim judgment which was final as to the first three issues covered but interim on the fourth and fifth issues which will have to be decided before the appeal can be finally determined. [read post]
16 Dec 2008, 2:00 pm
Wyeth was represented by Seth Waxman of Wilmer, Cutler, Pickering, Hale and Dorr. [read post]
3 Jul 2024, 10:43 am by Guest Author
Dodd-Frank gave the SEC power to hale him before the ALJs. [read post]
18 Dec 2012, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
  If, as Lord Matthew Hale believed, “rape…is an accusation easily to be made and hard to be proved, and harder to be defended by the party accused, tho never so innocent,” then we would want to be very cautious about allowing any serious consequences (such as the loss of parental rights or of liberty) to turn on a so-called “swearing contest” between the alleged victim and the alleged perpetrator. [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 8:30 am by Eugene Volokh
That is, if a defendant intentionally aims defamatory material at the forum state and knows or should know that the effects of the defamatory material are likely to have a "devastating impact" on the plaintiff in the forum state, then the defendant's knowledge about the defamatory material's effects in the forum state becomes "a purposeful contact or substantial connection whereby the intentional tortfeasor could reasonably expect to be haled into the forum… [read post]