Search for: "His Law v. USA" Results 3001 - 3020 of 3,297
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jan 2009, 2:06 am
"Regardless of the identity of a particular defendant or of his position in the commercial chain, the basis for his liability remains that he has marketed or distributed a defective product. [read post]
19 Jan 2009, 4:00 am
Amelia County Sheriff's Office7th Cir.o Muslim Associate States Cause of Action Against Large Law Firm For Post 9-11 DiscriminationHasan v. [read post]
11 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
” If he lives in the USA he may be aware that the original and authoritative and therefore binding (including upon the Supreme Court itself) Supreme Court precedent Worcester v. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 12:38 pm
Perhaps Elton John v Guardian News & Media Ltd [2008] is a step towards a more open and free speech parody defence that exists in the USA. [read post]
2 Jan 2009, 4:57 am
The statutes that authorize DHS to establish US-VISIT include, but are not limited to: Section 2(a) of the Immigration and Naturalization Service Data Management Improvement Act of 2000 (DMIA), Public Law 106-215, 114 Stat. 337 (June 15, 2000); Section 205 of the Visa Waiver Permanent Program Act of 2000, Public Law 106-396, 114 Stat. 1637, 1641 (Oct. 30, 2000); Section 414 of the Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct… [read post]
30 Dec 2008, 12:33 pm
Finally, the court found no error with the sentencing condition that he not have contact with his biological daughter, given that the molestation had occurred with what was essentially his stepdaughter.State v. [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 3:38 pm
  That's even more puzzling in light of the FC's also recent decision in Rentrop v. [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 3:09 pm
The 5-4 ruling, with Justice John Paul Stevens writing for the majority, was announced in his absence by Justice Anthony M. [read post]
13 Dec 2008, 10:03 am
On appeal, Dunn argues that the district court erred in deciding as a matter of law that the Officers' use of force was objectively reasonable. 08a0433p.06  James Pickens v. [read post]