Search for: "Human v. State" Results 3001 - 3020 of 19,128
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jun 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Applying the lenient notice-pleading standard afforded to discrimination claims (Vig v New York Hairspray Co., L.P., 67 AD3d 140, 145 [1st Dept 2009]), plaintiff alleged that he was subjected to race discrimination under the New York State Human Rights Law (State HRL) (Executive Law § 296) and New York City Human Rights Law (Administrative Code of City of NY § 8-107). [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Applying the lenient notice-pleading standard afforded to discrimination claims (Vig v New York Hairspray Co., L.P., 67 AD3d 140, 145 [1st Dept 2009]), plaintiff alleged that he was subjected to race discrimination under the New York State Human Rights Law (State HRL) (Executive Law § 296) and New York City Human Rights Law (Administrative Code of City of NY § 8-107). [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 5:55 pm by Nate Cardozo
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit Thursday, when EFF, human rights lawyer Scott Gilmore, and the law firms of Jones Day and Robins Kaplan went to court in Kidane v. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 2:05 pm by INFORRM
Proportionally restricting free speech rights In Murphy v IRTC Barrington J explained that, when there is a restriction on a constitutional right, the state can justify it if it meets a legitimate aim and is proportionate to that aim. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 2:34 pm by SJM
Pelipenko v Russia 16/1/14 We reported the ECtHR’s decision on the merits here. [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 2:40 pm
The second touches on the nature of the rights of individuals and is rooted in international law (and sometimes domestic constitutional law) defining the scope of the human rights of individuals and the consequential obligations of states and legal persons. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 2:44 am by INFORRM
  This is the first successful legal challenge to AFR technology and an important decision in relation to the regulation of state surveillance. [read post]
Entities exempted from the Act include (i) agencies, commissions, districts, etc. of the state or political subdivisions, (ii) nonprofits, (iii) higher education, (iv) national securities associations, (v) financial institutions or data subject to Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA), and (vi) hospitals as defined under Connecticut law. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 8:07 am by Indefensible
Most modern states embraced the general idea that government had a duty to protect the health, education and welfare of children. [read post]
11 Nov 2023, 1:24 am by Tobias Lutzi
In Lubbe v Cape, Connelly v RTZ and Vedanta, the English courts accepted jurisdiction, acknowledging that the absence of a means of funding or experienced lawyers to handle the case in a host state will lead to a real risk of the non-availability of substantial justice. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 4:10 am
He couched his complaint in terms of the College's "‘violations of federal, New York State, and New York City human rights laws, including but not limited to' various named statutes. [read post]