Search for: "IN RE JOHN B." Results 3001 - 3020 of 3,343
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Apr 2011, 8:25 am by INFORRM
First Amendment Cases In the case of USA v Alvarez (21 March 2011), the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit refused an en banc re-hearing of an appeal in which the Stolen Valor Act 2005 had been struck down. [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 4:29 pm by Rich Cassidy
As it stands, I don’t think the idea of professionalism as addressed by MCLE Rule 3(b) is easily understood. [read post]
28 Jul 2023, 1:02 pm by The White Law Group
In August of 2021, The Securities and Exchange Commission stated that John J. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 1:03 pm by Eugene Volokh
Blood Ctr., 213 F.R.D. 108, 112 (E.D.N.Y. 2003) (hepatitis B); Doe v. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 12:39 am by INFORRM
We begin to modify how we think… In a world like that where we’re restraining ourselves, it changes society in a major way,” Time reports. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 9:58 am by Jon Penney
Government surveillance powers and practices are often justified with reference to other national security concerns and threats like terrorism, as this House brief on the FISA re-authorization illustrates. [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 4:51 pm
  No charges have been filed against the young girl and mother who, along with another friend, created the profile and initiated the harassment. [11]     B. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 3:30 am by Peter Mahler
The following, numbered paragraphs, in which I’ll briefly summarize the salient issues addressed in the decision, more or less conform to the order in which they’re laid out in the decision. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 4:23 am by Susan Brenner
John Wayne Davis, Jr. was charged with “larceny in a building” in violation of Michigan Compiled Laws § 750.360 and with “receiving and concealing stolen property valued between $1,000 and $20,000” in violation of Michigan Compiled Laws § 750.535(3)(a). [read post]
14 Mar 2007, 10:24 pm
"It's horrible," said one large firm partner. [17]  B. [read post]
12 Oct 2016, 12:47 pm by Dykema
Treasury Department, the Secretary of the Treasury’s ability to intervene in the OCC’s affairs is strictly limited by that same statute the opinion cites (see 12 USC 1(b)(1. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
To date, our entire and complex body of law on insider trading has been derived from both courts and the SEC attempting to construe six ambiguous words in Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934: “manipulative or deceptive device or contrivance. [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 4:48 pm by Moderator
” (John Heilemann, New York Magazine, April 16, 2007). [read post]
16 Jan 2011, 4:40 pm by jamison
  You clearly fail to realize that Section 12(b)(3) of the law directly contradicts your argument! [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 4:24 am by Emma Snell
“We’ll show evidence of the president’s involvement in this scheme,” committee member Adam B. [read post]