Search for: "In INTEREST OF FEW v. State"
Results 3001 - 3020
of 11,570
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Dec 2013, 8:15 pm
The State needs to realize that reasonable accommodation plays the pivotal role of balancing the particular interests of persons with disabilities with the general societal interest. [read post]
18 Mar 2014, 2:34 pm
For example, in Syvrud v. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 10:50 am
(See, e.g., State of Mo. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2022, 3:34 pm
This involves a few considerations. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 9:54 pm
In Gregory v. [read post]
24 Jan 2017, 5:15 am
Judge Pryor has left no doubt where he stands on abortion, calling Roe -v- Wade, "the worst abomination in the history of constitutional law. [read post]
6 May 2013, 1:20 pm
Lukasz first reviewed the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) ruling in Case C-235/09 DHL v Chronopost, on the extent to which injunctive relief, granted in the court of one EU Member States, should or must extend to the entire extent of the EU? [read post]
26 Jan 2014, 12:30 am
There's only a few book reviews this week dedicated to Martin Luther King, Jr. [read post]
8 Aug 2022, 2:07 pm
On Tuesday, the Dusseldorf Regional Court will rule on a couple more Nokia v. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 9:01 pm
Department of Transportation v. [read post]
10 Jan 2010, 2:36 pm
It is only a County Court appeal decision, but there are some interesting points on the review process worth noting. [read post]
20 May 2009, 6:43 am
Lawrence v. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 5:41 am
Inc. v. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 3:00 am
However, in State v. [read post]
15 May 2012, 11:32 pm
In El Masri v Macedonia the complainant, Khalid El Masri (left)—a Lebanese national but German resident—will claim that Macedonia’s refusal to instigate a full and proper investigation of his rendition, together with the state’s direct involvement in the rendition itself, constitute a breach of the Convention. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 1:52 pm
 But I have a few problems with the use of this rationale here. [read post]
21 Oct 2012, 4:36 pm
In Baker v. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 6:02 am
This issue has popped up a few times over the years and the lesson, of course, is that not only is standing always a fundamental requirement, making that determination may require extra due diligence in community property states. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
In some cases, however, the Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency may be a consideration.The Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency states that only the entity that created the position may abolish it [i.e., a position created by a legislative act can only be abolished by a correlative legislative act" (Matter of Torre v. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
In some cases, however, the Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency may be a consideration.The Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency states that only the entity that created the position may abolish it [i.e., a position created by a legislative act can only be abolished by a correlative legislative act" (Matter of Torre v. [read post]
